The answers shown here are not necessarily the same provided as part of the 2009 PhilPapers Survey. These answers can be updated at any time.
Question | Answer | Comments | |
A priori knowledge: yes or no? | Accept: yes | on at least one interpretation of the a priori | |
Abstract objects: Platonism or nominalism? | Accept: Platonism | with the qualification that the forms are active | |
Aesthetic value: objective or subjective? | The question is too unclear to answer | The two terms stand in dialectical relation | |
Analytic-synthetic distinction: yes or no? | Lean toward: no | | |
Epistemic justification: internalism or externalism? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | What is "episteme", this has first to be settled | |
External world: idealism, skepticism, or non-skeptical realism? | Accept: idealism | "absolute idealism is the dogma of philosophy" (Hegel) | |
Free will: compatibilism, libertarianism, or no free will? | Accept: compatibilism | | |
God: theism or atheism? | Accept: theism | | |
Knowledge: empiricism or rationalism? | Accept: rationalism | | |
Knowledge claims: contextualism, relativism, or invariantism? | Lean toward: contextualism | | |
Laws of nature: Humean or non-Humean? | The question is too unclear to answer | Humean scepticism is well-founded and should lead dialectically to absolute idealism | |
Logic: classical or non-classical? | Lean toward: classical | Aristotelian logic and metaphysics as further developed by Hegel | |
Mental content: internalism or externalism? | Lean toward: internalism | | |
Meta-ethics: moral realism or moral anti-realism? | The question is too unclear to answer | am against moralism, for the virtues | |
Metaphilosophy: naturalism or non-naturalism? | Accept both | the natural is itself rational | |
Mind: physicalism or non-physicalism? | Accept: non-physicalism | | |
Moral judgment: cognitivism or non-cognitivism? | The question is too unclear to answer | I deal in ethics, not morals | |
Moral motivation: internalism or externalism? | The question is too unclear to answer | see above | |
Newcomb's problem: one box or two boxes? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Normative ethics: deontology, consequentialism, or virtue ethics? | Accept: virtue ethics | | |
Perceptual experience: disjunctivism, qualia theory, representationalism, or sense-datum theory? | Other | I find the question unintelligible as stated | |
Personal identity: biological view, psychological view, or further-fact view? | Other | Once one rejects abstract individuality as defensible, putting "I" as universal of universals, the whole question gets "aufgehoben" | |
Politics: communitarianism, egalitarianism, or libertarianism? | Lean toward: libertarianism | | |
Proper names: Fregean or Millian? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Science: scientific realism or scientific anti-realism? | Reject both | | |
Teletransporter (new matter): survival or death? | The question is too unclear to answer | death is not experienced | |
Time: A-theory or B-theory? | The question is too unclear to answer | in terms of McTaggart, I tend to accept his refutation of real time | |
Trolley problem (five straight ahead, one on side track, turn requires switching, what ought one do?): switch or don't switch? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |
Truth: correspondence, deflationary, or epistemic? | Accept another alternative | I do not have that alternative availably to thought just now | |
Zombies: inconceivable, conceivable but not metaphysically possible, or metaphysically possible? | Insufficiently familiar with the issue | | |