Sir, The recent report on “Broader Impacts” versus “Responsible Research and Innovation” concepts is very interesting . Many scientists in the present day follow the first concept due to factors. Scientists who want to apply for funds have to follow the criteria, which are usually focused on “impact” according to the US NIH principle. The American concept of “Broader Impacts” for judging the scientific value of the work is widely used in many developing countries at present. Indeed, the “Broader Impacts” (...) concept has its advantage as well as disadvantage. Sometimes the “impact” cannot be applied to some kinds of studies that are useful but not interesting. Some novel works might present new concepts that are hard to understand and this might be limited for further referencing and this can result in low “impact”. In addition, some practitioners might try every way to get the “highest possible impact”. They might perform a misconduct to reach the aim. Of interest, man .. (shrink)