Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Killing for knowledge.Tzachi Zamir - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):17–40.
    abstract I distinguish between four arguments commonly used to justify experimentation on animals (I). After delineating the autonomy of the question of experiments from other topics within animal ethics (II), I examine and reject each of these justifications (III–VI). I then explore two arguments according to which animal‐dependent experimentation should continue even if it is immoral (VII). I close with the way in which liberationists’ strategic considerations modify the moral conclusions of my analysis.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Life, Transferable: Questioning the Commodity-Based Approach to Transplantation Ethics.David B. Dillard-Wright - 2012 - Society and Animals 20 (2):138-153.
    Some bioethicists have proposed a legalized market in human organs as a solution to transplant waiting lists and global poverty. Solutions to organ procurement problems that are solely market-based would unfairly shift the burdens of medical procedures onto developing nations. Market advocates base their claims on the understanding of organs as property, a position that should be problematized. Instrumentalizing people in this way is part of the broader commodification of animals and the environment. Combating the market mentality requires a return (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark