Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Physicians’ communication patterns for motivating rectal cancer patients to biomarker research: Empirical insights and ethical issues.Sabine Wöhlke, Julia Perry & Silke Schicktanz - 2018 - Clinical Ethics 13 (4):175-188.
    In clinical research – whether pharmaceutical, genetic or biomarker research – it is important to protect research participants’ autonomy and to ensure or strengthen their control over health-related decisions. Empirical–ethical studies have argued that both the ethical concept and the current legalistic practice of informed consent should be adapted to the complexity of the clinical environment. For this, a better understanding of recruitment, for which also the physician–patient relationship plays an important role, is needed. Our aim is to ethically reflect (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Ensuring respect for persons in COMPASS: a cluster randomised pragmatic clinical trial.Joseph E. Andrews, J. Brian Moore, Richard B. Weinberg, Mysha Sissine, Sabina Gesell, Jacquie Halladay, Wayne Rosamond, Cheryl Bushnell, Sara Jones, Paula Means, Nancy M. P. King, Diana Omoyeni & Pamela W. Duncan - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics Recent Issues 44 (8):560-566.
    _341_ _Objectives: _In patients with multivessel disease both the detection of the culprit lesion and the exact allocation are important preconditions for sufficient treatment and improved outcome. In a vessel based approach the combination of quantitative coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve measured by a pressure wire should be advantageous compared to myocardial SPECT, as morphological and functional information is delivered simultaneously. Therefore our aim was to evaluate MS in the detection and allocation of hemodynamically significant stenoses obtained by the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark