Switch to: References

Citations of:

In defense of unfair compromises

Philosophical Studies 176 (11):2855-2875 (2019)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. May political parties refuse to govern? On integrity, compromise and responsibility.Fabian Wendt - 2023 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 26 (7):1028-1047.
    After the parliamentary elections in Germany in September 2017, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the Christian Social Union (CSU), The Greens (Bündnis90/Die Grünen) and the Free Democratic Party (FDP) started to negotiate about forming a coalition government. But, surprising to many, the FDP decided to let these coalition talks collapse, and many commentators in Germany found it highly problematic for a political party to refuse to take responsibility in government. Interestingly, the question whether (or: when) democratic parties may legitimately refuse (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Against compromise in democracy? A plea for a fine‐grained assessment.Sandrine Baume & Yannis Papadopoulos - 2022 - Constellations 29 (4):475-491.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Why a fair compromise requires deliberation.Friderike Spang - 2021 - Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17 (1):38-47.
    I argue in this paper that the process of compromising needs to be deliberative if a fair compromise is the goal. More specifically, I argue that deliberation is structurally necessary in order to achieve a fair compromise. In developing this argument, this paper seeks to overcome a problematic dichotomy that is prevalent in the literature on deliberative democracy, which is the dichotomy between compromise and deliberation. This dichotomy entails the view that the process preceding the achievement of a compromise is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark