Switch to: References

Citations of:

Material Falsity and Error in Descartes' Meditations

New York: Routledge (2005)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Heidegger frente a Husserl en la Introducción a la investigación fenomenológica.Hernán Gabriel Inverso - 2017 - Estudios de Filosofía (Universidad de Antioquia) 56:49-72.
    Desde los orígenes de su formación en fenomenología, Heidegger emprendió modificaciones metodológicas que tematizan el campo de la vida preteórica y llevan a la hermenéutica del Dasein creando tensiones respecto de Husserl que afectaron tanto la dimensión teórica como la personal. En este trabajo se estudia este viraje señalando sus orígenes tempranos y concentrándose en los aportes del curso Introducción a la investigación fenomenológica, del semestre de invierno de 1923/1924. Este ámbito presenta aspectos relevantes para comprender el modo en que (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Objective Being and “Ofness” in Descartes.Lionel Shapiro - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (2):378-418.
    It is generally assumed that Descartes invokes “objective being in the intellect” in order to explain or describe an idea’s status as being “of something.” I argue that this assumption is mistaken. As emerges in his discussion of “materially false ideas” in the Fourth Replies, Descartes recognizes two senses of ‘idea of’. One, a theoretical sense, is itself introduced in terms of objective being. Hence Descartes can’t be introducing objective being to explain or describe “ofness” understood in this sense. Descartes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Intentionality Bifurcated: A Lesson from Early Modern Philosophy?Lionel Shapiro - 2013 - In Martin Lenz & Anik Waldow (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Nature and Norms in Thought. Springer.
    This paper examines the pressures leading two very different Early Modern philosophers, Descartes and Locke, to invoke two ways in which thought is directed at objects. According to both philosophers, I argue, the same idea can simultaneously count as “of” two different objects—in two different senses of the phrase ‘idea of’. One kind of intentional directedness is invoked in answering the question What is it to think that thus-and-so? The other kind is invoked in answering the question What accounts for (...)
    $60.60 new   (collection)    View on Amazon.com
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Of Dreams, Demons, and Whirlpools: Doubt, Skepticism, and Suspension of Judgment in Descartes's Meditations.Jan Forsman - 2021 - Dissertation, Tampere University
    I offer a novel reading in this dissertation of René Descartes’s (1596–1650) skepticism in his work Meditations on First Philosophy (1641–1642). I specifically aim to answer the following problem: How is Descartes’s skepticism to be read in accordance with the rest of his philosophy? This problem can be divided into two more general questions in Descartes scholarship: How is skepticism utilized in the Meditations, and what are its intentions and relation to the preceding philosophical tradition? -/- I approach the topic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Problem of Distinction of the Ideas of Things from the Ideas of Nonthings in Descartes.Predrag Milidrag - 2012 - Filozofska Istrazivanja 32 (2):261-278.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•