Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.Jenna L. Zhao & Steven B. Most - 2018 - Cognition and Emotion 33 (3):442-451.
    ABSTRACTEmotional distractors can impair perception of subsequently presented targets, a phenomenon called emotion-induced blindness. Do emotional distractors lose their power to disrupt perception when appearing with increased frequency, perhaps due to desensitisation or enhanced recruitment of proactive control? Non-emotional tasks, such as the Stroop, have revealed that high frequency distractors or conflict lead to reduced interference, and distractor frequency appears to modulate attentional capture by emotional distractors in spatial attention tasks. But emotion-induced blindness is thought to reflect perceptual competition between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reward learning and negative emotion during rapid attentional competition.Takemasa Yokoyama, Srikanth Padmala & Luiz Pessoa - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
  • Arousal (but not valence) amplifies the impact of salience.Matthew R. Sutherland & Mara Mather - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (3):616-622.
    Previous findings indicate that negative arousal enhances bottom-up attention biases favouring perceptual salient stimuli over less salient stimuli. The current study tests whether those effects were driven by emotional arousal or by negative valence by comparing how well participants could identify visually presented letters after hearing either a negative arousing, positive arousing or neutral sound. On each trial, some letters were presented in a high contrast font and some in a low contrast font, creating a set of targets that differed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Emotion Induced Blindness Is More Sensitive to Changes in Arousal As Compared to Valence of the Emotional Distractor.Divita Singh & Meera M. Sunny - 2017 - Frontiers in Psychology 8.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Beyond perceptual judgment: Categorization and emotion shape what we see.Steven B. Most - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Emotional stimuli similarly disrupt attention in both visual fields.Ella K. Moeck, Jenna L. Zhao, Steven B. Most, Nicole A. Thomas & Melanie K. T. Takarangi - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (4):633-649.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The emotional attentional blink: what we know so far.Maureen McHugo, Bunmi O. Olatunji & David H. Zald - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
  • Norepinephrine ignites local hotspots of neuronal excitation: How arousal amplifies selectivity in perception and memory.Mara Mather, David Clewett, Michiko Sakaki & Carolyn W. Harley - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-100.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Encoding of goal-relevant stimuli is strengthened by emotional arousal in memory.Tae-Ho Lee, Steven G. Greening & Mara Mather - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Prior memory encoding of negative distractors biases emotion-induced blindness.Lei Jia, Yuling Zhao, Billy Sung, Mengru Cheng, Xiaoqin Wang & Jun Wang - 2023 - Cognition and Emotion 37 (6):1116-1122.
    Previous research has shown that the proactive deprioritization of emotional distractors through the provision of information about the distractors or passive habituation of emotional distractors may attenuate emotion-induced blindness (EIB) in the rapid serial visual presentation stream. However, whether prior memory encoding of emotional distractors could bias the EIB effect remains unknown. To address this question, this study employed a three-phase paradigm integrating an item-method direct forgetting (DF) procedure with a classic EIB procedure. Participants completed a memory coding phase to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception: evidence from two temporal attention tasks.Daniel Guilbert, Steven B. Most & Kim M. Curby - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (3):450-461.
    ABSTRACTThe visual system has been found to prioritise emotional stimuli so robustly that their presence can temporarily “blind” people to non-emotional targets in their direct line of vision. This...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Moderate threat causes longer lasting disruption to processing in anxious individuals.Sophie Forster, Anwar O. Nunez-Elizalde, Elizabeth Castle & Sonia J. Bishop - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  • Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects.Chaz Firestone & Brian J. Scholl - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39:1-72.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   199 citations