Switch to: References

Citations of:

Development: three grades of ontogenetic involvement

In Mohan Matthen & Christopher Stephens (eds.), Philosophy of Biology. Elsevier. pp. 179--200 (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Genidentity and Biological Processes.Thomas Pradeu - 2018 - In Daniel J. Nicholson & John Dupré (eds.), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    A crucial question for a process view of life is how to identify a process and how to follow it through time. The genidentity view can contribute decisively to this project. It says that the identity through time of an entity X is given by a well-identified series of continuous states of affairs. Genidentity helps address the problem of diachronic identity in the living world. This chapter describes the centrality of the concept of genidentity for David Hull and proposes an (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The Phylogeny Fallacy and Evolutionary Causation (preprint).Tiago Rama - manuscript
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Handbook of Evolutionary Thinking in the Sciences.Thomas Heams, Philippe Huneman, Guillaume Lecointre & Marc Silberstein (eds.) - 2015 - Springer.
    The Darwinian theory of evolution is itself evolving and this book presents the details of the core of modern Darwinism and its latest developmental directions. The authors present current scientific work addressing theoretical problems and challenges in four sections, beginning with the concepts of evolution theory, its processes of variation, heredity, selection, adaptation and function, and its patterns of character, species, descent and life. The second part of this book scrutinizes Darwinism in the philosophy of science and its usefulness in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Natural Selection is not Environmental Selection: Revisiting Lewontin’s Argument From Niche Construction.Lynn Chiu - unknown
    Richard Lewontin is often cited as an inspiration and founder of what is now known as Niche Construction Theory. The first goal of this paper is to argue that they present distinct arguments from niche construction against Adaptationism. While Niche Construction Theory argues that natural selection is not the only adaptive evolutionary force, Lewontin rejects the externalist characterization of natural selection. The key difference lies in the types of phenomena that are allowed to count as “niche construction” and their argumentative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark