Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Inflated effect sizes and underpowered tests: how the severity measure of evidence is affected by the winner’s curse.Guillaume Rochefort-Maranda - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 178 (1):133-145.
    My aim in this paper is to show how the problem of inflated effect sizes corrupts the severity measure of evidence. This has never been done. In fact, the Winner’s Curse is barely mentioned in the philosophical literature. Since the severity score is the predominant measure of evidence for frequentist tests in the philosophical literature, it is important to underscore its flaws. It is also crucial to bring the philosophical literature up to speed with the limits of classical testing. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Evidence amalgamation in the sciences: an introduction.Roland Poellinger, Jürgen Landes & Samuel C. Fletcher - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3163-3188.
    Amalgamating evidence from heterogeneous sources and across levels of inquiry is becoming increasingly important in many pure and applied sciences. This special issue provides a forum for researchers from diverse scientific and philosophical perspectives to discuss evidence amalgamation, its methodologies, its history, its pitfalls, and its potential. We situate the contributions therein within six themes from the broad literature on this subject: the variety-of-evidence thesis, the philosophy of meta-analysis, the role of robustness/sensitivity analysis for evidence amalgamation, its bearing on questions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Is meta-analysis of RCTs assessing the efficacy of interventions a reliable source of evidence for therapeutic decisions?Mariusz Maziarz - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):159-167.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation