Switch to: References

Citations of:

Genetic Modification of Animals

The Monist 79 (2):247-263 (1996)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The food debate: Ethical versus substantial equivalence. [REVIEW]Sylvie Pouteau - 2002 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 15 (3):289-303.
    Substantial equivalence has beenintroduced to assess novel foods, includinggenetically modified food, by means ofcomparison with traditional food. Besides anumber of objections concerning its scientificvalidity for risk assessment, the maindifficulty with SE is that it implies that foodcan be qualified on a purely substantial basis.SE embodies the assumption that only reductivescientific arguments are legitimate fordecision-making in public policy due to theemphasis on legal issues. However, the surge ofthe food debate clearly shows that thistechnocratic model is not accepted anymore. Food is more (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Does organic farming face distinctive livestock welfare issues? – A conceptual analysis.Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe, Mette Vaarst & Erik Steen Kristensen - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):275-299.
    The recent development and growth oforganic livestock farming and the relateddevelopment of national and internationalregulations has fueled discussions amongscientists and philosophers concerning theproper conceptualization of animal welfare.These discussions on livestock welfare inorganic farming draw on the conventionaldiscussions and disputes on animal welfare thatinvolve issues such as different definitions ofwelfare (clinical health, absence of suffering,sum of positive and negative experiences,etc.), the possibility for objective measuresof animal welfare, and the acceptable level ofwelfare. It seems clear that livestock welfareis a value-laden concept and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations