Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Formal and semantic aspects of tibetan buddhist debate logic.Tom J. F. Tillemans - 1989 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 17 (3):265-297.
  • An early tibetan view of the soteriology of buddhist epistemology: The case of 'bri-gung 'jig-rten mgon-po. [REVIEW]Leonard W. J. Kuijp - 1987 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 15 (1):57-70.
  • Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge on Argumentation by Consequence (thal ʼgyur): The Nature, Function, and Form of Consequence Statements.Pascale Hugon - 2013 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (6):671-702.
    This paper presents the main aspects of the views of the Tibetan logician Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109–1169) on argumentation “by consequence” (thal ʼgyur, Skt. prasaṅga) based on his exposition of the topic in the fifth chapter of his Tshad ma yid kyi mun sel and on a parallel excursus in his commentary on Dharmakīrti’s Pramānaviniścaya. It aims at circumscribing primarily the nature and function of consequences (thal ʼgyur/thal ba) for this author—in particular the distinction between “proving consequences” (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Arguments by Parallels in the Epistemological Works of Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge.Pascale Hugon - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (1):93-114.
    The works of the Tibetan logician Phya pa Chos kyi seng ge (1109–1169) make abundant use of a particular type of argument that I term ‘argument by parallels’. Their main characteristic is that the instigator of the argument, addressing a thesis in a domain A, introduces a parallel thesis in an unrelated domain B. And in the ensuing dialogue, each of the instigator’s statements consists in replicating his interlocutor’s previous assertion, mutatis mutandis, in the other domain (A or B). I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations