Switch to: References

Citations of:

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Causation, measurement relevance and no-conspiracy in EPR.Iñaki San Pedro - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):137-156.
    In this paper I assess the adequacy of no-conspiracy conditions employed in the usual derivations of the Bell inequality in the context of EPR correlations. First, I look at the EPR correlations from a purely phenomenological point of view and claim that common cause explanations of these cannot be ruled out. I argue that an appropriate common cause explanation requires that no-conspiracy conditions are re-interpreted as mere common cause-measurement independence conditions. In the right circumstances then, violations of measurement independence need (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Can the causal paradoxes of qm be explained in the framework of qed?György Darvas - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (4):273-280.
    Attemts to explain causal paradoxes of Quantum Mechanics (QM) have tried to solve the problems within the framework of Quantum Electrodynamics (QED). We will show, that this is impossible. The original theory of QED by Dirac (Proc Roy Soc A117:610, 1928) formulated in its preamble four preliminary requirements that the new theory should meet. The first of these requirements was that the theory must be causal. Causality is not to be derived as a consequence of the theory since it was (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark