- Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2011 - Theoria 26 (3):329-343.details
|
|
Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination (1981).William C. Wimsatt - 2012 - In Lena Soler (ed.), Characterizing the robustness of science: after the practice turn in philosophy of science. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 61-78.details
|
|
The significance test controversy. [REVIEW]Ronald N. Giere - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):170-181.details
|
|
Using Computer-Assisted Argument Mapping to Teach Reasoning to Students.Martin Davies, Ashley Barnett & Tim van Gelder - 2021 - In J. Anthony Blair (ed.), The Critical Thinking Anthology. pp. 115-152.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.details
|
|
Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky.David Zarefsky - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality.Erik Weber, Joke Meheus & Dietlinde Wouters (eds.) - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Handbook of Logical Thought in India.Sundar Sarukkai & Mihir Chakraborty (eds.) - 2018 - New Delhi, India: Springer.details
|
|
Ars Topica: The Classical Technique of Constructing Arguments From Aristotle to Cicero.Sara Rubinelli - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Data Journeys in the Sciences.Sabina Leonelli & Niccolò Tempini (eds.) - 2020 - Springer.details
|
|
Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.) - 2012 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Štyri antické argumenty o budúcich nahodnostiach (Four Ancient Arguments on Future Contingencies).Vladimir Marko - 2017 - Bratislava, Slovakia: Univerzita Komenského.details
|
|
Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing about Doing.Christian Kock (ed.) - 2017 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation.Harald R. Wohlrapp - 2014 - Dordrecht NL: Springer.details
|
|
Dialogues in Argumentation.Von Burg Ron - 2016 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
Project report: Split-up — a legal expert system which determines property division upon divorce. [REVIEW]John Zeleznikow, Andrew Stranieri & Mark Gawler - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (4):267-275.details
|
|
An australian perspective on research and development required for the construction of applied legal decision support systems.John Zeleznikow - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):237-260.details
|
|
The Brexit referendum: how trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic.Franco Zappettini - 2019 - Critical Discourse Studies 16 (4):403-419.details
|
|
Mapping the Structure of Debate.Jeff Yoshimi - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Argumentation, epistemology and the sociology of language.Steven Yearly - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (3):351-367.details
|
|
Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures.Olena Yaskorska-Shah - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (4):551-580.details
|
|
Diagramming Objections To Independent Premises.Cathal Woods - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):139-151.details
|
|
Evaluating psychodiagnostic decisions.Cilia L. M. Witteman, Clare Harries, Hilary L. Bekker & Edward J. M. Van Aarle - 2007 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (1):10-15.details
|
|
Learning how to learn: A critique.Christopher Winch - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):649-665.details
|
|
Developing critical rationality as a pedagogical aim.Christopher Winch - 2004 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 38 (3):467–484.details
|
|
Ability, intelligence and practical education.Christopher Winch - 1988 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 22 (1):35–45.details
|
|
How Uncertain Do We Need to Be?Jon Williamson - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (6):1249-1271.details
|
|
Computer decision-support systems for public argumentation: assessing deliberative legitimacy. [REVIEW]William Rehg, Peter McBurney & Simon Parsons - 2005 - AI and Society 19 (3):203-228.details
|
|
More models just means more difficulty.N. E. Wetherick - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):367-368.details
|
|
Towards an account of argumentation in science.Mark Weinstein - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (3):269-298.details
|
|
Reason and refutation: a review of two recent books by Harvey Siegel. [REVIEW]Mark Weinstein - 1992 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 11 (3):231-263.details
|
|
Reason and Critical Thinking.Mark Weinstein - 1988 - Informal Logic 10 (1).details
|
|
Policy research as advocacy: Pro and con.Carol H. Weiss - 1991 - Knowledge, Technology & Policy 4 (1):37-55.details
|
|
Psychological Research and the Epistemological Approach to Argumentation.Michael P. Weinstock - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (1):103-120.details
|
|
Neutrality, Pluralism, and Education: Civic Education as Learning About the Other.Jack Russell Weinstein - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 23 (4):235-263.details
|
|
Argumentation: The Mixed Game. [REVIEW]Edda Weigand - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (1):59-87.details
|
|
Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.details
|
|
Varieties of modal (classificatory) and comparative probability.Peter Walley & Terrence L. Fine - 1979 - Synthese 41 (3):321 - 374.details
|
|
How Dialogic Settings Influence Evidence Use in Adolescent Students.Fabrizio Macagno & Elizabeth Mayweg-Paus - 2016 - Zeitschrift Für Padagogische Psychologie 30:121-132.details
|
|
Structures of Logic in Policy and Theory: Identifying Sub-systemic Bricks for Investigating, Building, and Understanding Conceptual Systems.Steven E. Wallis - 2015 - Foundations of Science 20 (3):213-231.details
|
|
On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.details
|
|
Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Synthese 152 (2):237-284.details
|
|
Begging the Question in Arguments Based on Testimony.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (1):85-113.details
|
|
Building a System for Finding Objections to an Argument.Douglas Walton - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (3):369-391.details
|
|
Arguing from Definition to Verbal Classification: The Case of Redefining 'Planet' to Exclude Pluto.Douglas Walton - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):129-154.details
|
|
The Assessment of Argumentation from Expert Opinion.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):329-339.details
|
|
Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors.Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):221 - 253.details
|
|
Toulmin’s Model and the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems.James F. Voss - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):321-329.details
|
|