Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Methodology of examining the efficient markets hypothesis - gradual evolution or paradigmatic leaps?Michal Vyletelka - 2021 - E-Logos 28 (2):16-25.
    Článok reflektuje historický vývoj skúmania hypotézy efektívnych trhov s vybranými stanoviskami metodológie vedy. Z vedeckého skúmania finančných trhov sa zdá, že aj napriek zdanlivým paradigmatickým prechodom medzi jednotlivými hypotézami o efektivite trhov sa úroveň vedeckého poznania menila kontinuálne, predovšetkým kvôli postupnej aplikácii nových analytických inštrumentov a nových metód testovania. Protichodné vedecké teórie vznikali a boli testované súbežne, rozdiel medzi ich prijatím a zamietnutím spočíval na sile empirických dôkazov poskytnutých v danom časovom období. Vývoj skúmaných teórií s postupne robustnejším metodickým rámcom (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • A structuralist response to a skeptic.Irving E. Sigel - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):148-149.
  • Interpretation of stage as structure.Paul A. Roodin - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):148-148.
  • Did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's?S. J. Prokhovnik - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):336-340.
  • Task Structure Versus Cognitive Structure.Robert H. Pollack - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):147-148.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Importance of History and Philosophy of Science in Correcting Distorted Views of ‘Amount of Substance’ and ‘Mole’ Concepts in Chemistry Teaching.Kira Padilla & Carles Furio-Mas - 2008 - Science & Education 17 (4):403-424.
  • On stages and stage-building.Keith E. Nelson - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):146-147.
  • Horizontal structure and the concept of stage.David Moshman - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):145-146.
  • The stage concept in developmental theory: a dialectic alternative.Richard M. Lerner - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):144-145.
  • Human understanding: a question of description.Joseph T. Lawton - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):144-144.
  • Environmental factors and the organization of developmental changes.Barbara Koslowski - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):143-144.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Brainerd on the cognitive structure and integration criteria.Frank H. Hooper - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):142-143.
  • Scaling, uniqueness, and integration.John W. Gyr - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):141-142.
  • Reviews. [REVIEW]Jerzy Giedymin - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):307-313.
  • On preserving and extending Piaget's contributions.Howard Gardner - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):141-141.
  • Equilibration – the central concept of Piaget's theory.Jeanette McCarthy Gallagher - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):141-141.
  • Was Frege a linguistic philosopher? [REVIEW]Gregory Currie - 1976 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):79-92.
  • The stage heuristic in the study of sensorimotor intelligence.Edward H. Cornell - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):140-141.
  • Is the progress of science evolutionary? [REVIEW]L. Jonathan Cohen - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):41-61.
  • A primatological prespective.Suzanne Chevalier-Skolnikoff - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):139-140.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • On the four kinds of causality.Allan R. Buss - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):139-139.
  • Further replies on invariant sequences, explanation, and other stage criteria.Charles J. Brainerd - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):149-154.
  • Brainerd versus Aristotle with Piaget looking on.Elizabeth Bates - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):138-139.
  • The need for synthetic cognitive development theory.William M. Bart - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):137-138.
  • Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.
    The article develops and justifies, on the basis of the epistemological argumentation theory, two central pieces of the theory of evaluative argumentation interpretation: 1. criteria for recognizing argument types and 2. rules for adding reasons to create ideal arguments. Ad 1: The criteria for identifying argument types are a selection of essential elements from the definitions of the respective argument types. Ad 2: After presenting the general principles for adding reasons (benevolence, authenticity, immanence, optimization), heuristics are proposed for finding missing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations