- Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303.details
|
|
Using Argument Diagramming to Teach Critical Thinking in a First-Year Writing Course.Maralee Harrell & Danielle Wetzel - 2015 - In Ron Barnett & Bob Ennis Martin Davies (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Critical Thinking in Higher Education. pp. 213-232.details
|
|
A means-end classification of argumentation schemes.Fabrizio Macagno - 2015 - In Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 183-201.details
|
|
Rhetorical Perspectives on Argumentation: Selected Essays by David Zarefsky.David Zarefsky - 2014 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer.details
|
|
Logic, Reasoning, and Rationality.Erik Weber, Joke Meheus & Dietlinde Wouters (eds.) - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Handbook of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C. W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij & Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2014 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic.Robert Pinto - 2001 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij (eds.) - 2006 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The Greenhouse: A Welfare Assessment and Some Morals.Christoph Lumer - 2002 - Lanham, MD; New York; Oxford: University Press of America.details
|
|
The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation.Harald R. Wohlrapp - 2014 - Dordrecht NL: Springer.details
|
|
Rhetorical Aspects of Popular Science.Maria Załęska - 2016 - Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Polonica 35 (5):31-42.details
|
|
Schemes, Critical Questions, and Complete Argument Evaluation.Shiyang Yu & Frank Zenker - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (4):469-498.details
|
|
How to justify a backing’s eligibility for a warrant: the justification of a legal interpretation in a hard case.Shiyang Yu & Xi Chen - 2023 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 31 (2):239-268.details
|
|
Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies.Cristián Santibáñez Yáñez - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):132-159.details
|
|
Towards a Research Agenda for Informal Logic and Critical Thinking.Mark Weinstein - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (3).details
|
|
Towards an account of argumentation in science.Mark Weinstein - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (3):269-298.details
|
|
Exemplifying an Internal Realist Model of Truth.Mark Weinstein - 2002 - Philosophica 69 (1).details
|
|
Wrenching from Context: The Manipulation of Commitments.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):283-317.details
|
|
Plausible deniability and evasion of burden of proof.Douglas Walton - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):47-58.details
|
|
A framework for the extraction and modeling of fact-finding reasoning from legal decisions: lessons from the Vaccine/Injury Project Corpus. [REVIEW]Vern R. Walker, Nathaniel Carie, Courtney C. DeWitt & Eric Lesh - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (4):291-331.details
|
|
Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme.Bart Verheij - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):347-371.details
|
|
The Study of Metaphor in Argumentation Theory.Lotte van Poppel - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (1):177-208.details
|
|
Authority-based Argumentative Strategies: A Model for their Evaluation.Taeda Jovičić - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Objectivity applied to embodied subjects in health care and social security medicine: definition of a comprehensive concept of cognitive objectivity and criteria for its application.Hans Magnus Solli & António Barbosa da Silva - 2018 - BMC Medical Ethics 19 (1):15.details
|
|
Using Toulmin's Framework for the Analysis of Everyday Argumentation: Some Methodological Considerations.Maria Simosi - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (2):185-202.details
|
|
Decoupling Representations and the Chain of Arguments.Cristián Santibáñez - 2021 - Informal Logic 41 (2):165-186.details
|
|
Agente crítico, democracia deliberativa y el acto de dar razones.Cristián Santibáñez - 2020 - Co-herencia 17 (32):37-65.details
|
|
Analyzing Conversational Reasoning.Merrilee H. Salmon & Colleen M. Zeitz - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (1).details
|
|
An alternative logical framework for dialectical reasoning in the social and policy sciences.Ru Michael Sabre - 1991 - Theory and Decision 30 (3):187-211.details
|
|
Purpose, Argument Fields, and Theoretical Justification.Robert C. Rowland - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):235-250.details
|
|
Argumentative Thinking: An Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychology and Argumentation.Lance J. Rips - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):327-336.details
|
|
In the face of relativism: Stephen Toulminsʼs latest views on rhetoric and argumentation.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - 2015 - Revista Filosófica de Coimbra 24 (47):95-110.details
|
|
The Revelation Argument. A 'Communicational Fallacy'.Marco Rühl - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):73-96.details
|
|
Analyzing Argumentation In Rich, Natural Contexts.Anita Reznitskaya & Richard C. Anderson - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):175-198.details
|
|
Assessing the Cogency of Arguments: lbree Kinds of Merits.William Rehg - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (2):95-115.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes in Persuasive Brochures.Peter Jan Schellens & Menno de Jong - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (3):295-323.details
|
|
Bridging the gap between argumentation theory and the philosophy of mathematics.Alison Pease, Alan Smaill, Simon Colton & John Lee - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):111-135.details
|
|
In Just What Sense Should I be Critical? An Exploration into the Notion of ‘Assumption’ and Some Implications for Assessment.Andrés Mejía D. - 2009 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (4):351-367.details
|
|
Formulations on Israeli political talk radio: From actions and sequences to stance via dialogic resonance1.Yael Maschler, Gonen Dori-Hacohen & Bracha Nir - 2014 - Discourse Studies 16 (4):534-571.details
|
|
Pragmatic Maxims and Presumptions in Legal Interpretation.Fabrizio Macagno, Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2018 - Law and Philosophy 37 (1):69-115.details
|
|
Ethics of biogerontology: a teaching concept.Leona Litterst, Zoé Rheinsberg, Mone Spindler, Hans-Jörg Ehni, Julia Dietrich & Uta Müller - 2018 - International Journal of Ethics Education 3 (1):31-46.details
|
|
Is There a Fallacy of Small Sample?Thomas Leddy - 1986 - Informal Logic 8 (1).details
|
|
Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education.Aikaterini Konstantinidou & Fabrizio Macagno - 2013 - Science & Education 22 (5):1069-1087.details
|
|
The empirical relevance of Perelman's New Rhetoric.Manfred Kienpointner - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):419-437.details
|
|
Revolutionary Rhetoric: Georg Büchner’s “Der Hessische Landbote” – A Case Study. [REVIEW]Manfred Kienpointner - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (2):129-149.details
|
|
Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.Constanza Ihnen Jory - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):145-165.details
|
|
Argumentation as Rule-Justified Claims: Elements of a Conceptual Framework for the Critical Analysis of Argument.Michael Inbar - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):27-42.details
|
|
Points of View.Peter Houtlosser - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (3):387-405.details
|
|
Doing the Right Thing: A Qualitative Investigation of Retractions Due to Unintentional Error.Mohammad Hosseini, Medard Hilhorst, Inez de Beaufort & Daniele Fanelli - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):189-206.details
|
|