Switch to: References

Citations of:

Ethical Universalism and Particularism: A Comparison of Outlooks

In William M. Sullivan & Will Kymlicka (eds.), The Globalization of Ethics: Religious and Secular Perspectives. Cambridge University Press (2007)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A New Framework for Understanding Inequalities Between Expatriates and Host Country Nationals.Victor Oltra, Jaime Bonache & Chris Brewster - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 115 (2):291-310.
    An interdisciplinary theoretical framework is proposed for analysing justice in global working conditions. In addition to gender and race as popular criteria to identify disadvantaged groups in organizations, in multinational corporations (MNCs) local employees (i.e. host country nationals (HCNs) working in foreign subsidiaries) deserve special attention. Their working conditions are often substantially worse than those of expatriates (i.e. parent country nationals temporarily assigned to a foreign subsidiary). Although a number of reasons have been put forward to justify such inequalities—usually with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Intervening on Behalf of the Human Right to Health: Who, When, and How?Kathryn Muyskens - 2021 - Human Rights Review 22 (2):173-191.
    A common understanding of the political function of human rights is as a trigger for international intervention, with states typically understood to be duty bound by these rights claims. The unique character of the human right to health raises some complications for these conventional views. In this paper, I will argue that because of the unique character of the human right to health, intervention on its behalf can be justified not only in response to outright violation, but also due to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • When the universal is particular: a re-examination of the common morality using the work of Charles Taylor.Michelle C. Bach - 2021 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 25 (1):141-151.
    Beauchamp and Childress’ biomedical principlism is nearly synonymous with medical ethics for most clinicians. Their four principles are theoretically derived from the “common morality”, a universal cache of moral beliefs and claims shared by all morally serious humans. Others have challenged the viability of the common morality, but none have attempted to explain why the common morality makes intuitive sense to Western ethicists. Here I use the work of Charles Taylor to trace how events in the Western history of ideas (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark