Switch to: References

Citations of:

Bounds of Sense

Routledge (1966)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Is historical thinking unnatural?Jong-pil Yoon - 2022 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 54 (7):1022-1033.
    This essay critically examines the so-called ‘unnaturalness’ of historical thinking. I identify and analyse three lines of argument frequently invoked by historians to defend the validity of historical inquiry in response to scepticism, which is often couched in postmodern terms. In doing so, I highlight that these lines of argument are predicated upon historians’ thought processes and concepts being domain general. This idea of historical thinking as part of our ordinary thinking could help us develop a history curriculum in which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Reply to Lorne Falkenstein.Rae Langton - 2001 - Kantian Review 5:64-72.
    In Kantian Humility I argue that, for Kant, ignorance of things in themselves is ignorance of the intrinsic properties of substances, and that this is epistemic humility, rather than idealism: some aspects of reality, the intrinsic aspects, are beyond our epistemic grasp.The interpretation draws upon what Falkenstein takes to be ‘a novel and not implausible understanding of Kant's distinction between things in themselves and appearances’ which views it as a distinction between the intrinsic and the relational. He concedes that Kant (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Reflections on predictive processing and the mind. An Interview.Jakob Hohwy - 2014 - Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies (3):145-152.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Kant, Neo‐Kantians, and Transcendental Subjectivity.Charlotte Baumann - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):595-616.
    This article discusses an interpretation of Kant's conception of transcendental subjectivity, which manages to avoid many of the concerns that have been raised by analytic interpreters over this doctrine. It is an interpretation put forward by selected C19 and early C20 neo-Kantian writers. The article starts out by offering a neo-Kantian interpretation of the object as something that is constituted by the categories and that serves as a standard of truth within a theory of judgment. The second part explicates transcendental (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations