Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The teleological/deontological distinction.Peter Vallentyne - 1987 - Journal of Value Inquiry 21 (1):21-32.
    The teleological/deontological distinction was introduced in 1930 by C.D. Broad] and since then it has come to be accepted as the fundamental classificatory distinction for moral philosophy. I shall argue that the presupposition that there is a single fundamental classificatory distinction is false. There are too many features of moral theories that matter for that to be so. I shall argue furthermore that as it is usually drawn the teleological/deontological distinction is not even a fundamental distinction. Another distinction, that between (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Bruce Lee and the Trolley Problem: An Analysis from an Asian Martial Arts Tradition.William Sin - 2022 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 16 (1):81-95.
    In this paper, I approach the trolley problem from a different angle, and align the perspective with non-Western models of philosophy as instruction for life. I argue that the trolley problem is an...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing?Glen Pettigrove - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):191-207.
    Thomas Hurka, Simon Keller, and Julia Annas have recently argued that virtue ethics is self-effacing. I contend that these arguments are rooted in a mistaken understanding of the role that ideal agency and agent flourishing (should) play in virtue ethics. I then show how a virtue ethical theory can avoid the charge of self-effacement and why it is important that it do so.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • On the Relationship Between the Aretaic and the Deontic.Jarek Gryz - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):493-501.
    There are two fundamental classes of terms traditionally distinguished within moral vocabulary: the deontic and the aretaic. The terms from the first set serve in the prescriptive function of a moral code. The second class contains terms used for a moral evaluation of an action. The problem of the relationship between the aretaic and the deontic has not been discussed often by philosophers. It is, however, a very important and interesting issue: any normative ethical theory which takes as basic one (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•