Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Nāgārjuna’s Catuṣkoṭi.Jan Westerhoff - 2006 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (4):367-395.
    The catuṣkoṭi or tetralemma is an argumentative figure familiar to any reader of Buddhist philosophical literature. Roughly speaking it consists of the enumeration of four alternatives: that some propositions holds, that it fails to hold, that it both holds and fails to hold, that it neither holds nor fails to hold. The tetralemma also constitutes one of the more puzzling features of Buddhist philosophy as the use to which it is put in arguments is not immediately obvious and certainly not (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • The concept of metalanguage and its Indian background introduction.Frits Staal - 1975 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 3 (3-4):315-354.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Ritual, grammar, and the origins of science in india.Frits Staal - 1982 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 10 (1):3-35.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Otto’s idea of the ‘numinous’- A crosscultural reappraisal.Serena O’Meley - 1995 - Sophia 34 (1):241-258.
    Rudolf Otto’s concept of the ‘numinous’ was developed through study, observation, personal experience and religious and philosophical influences. The main philosophical influences for Otto's thought came from Fries, Schleiermacher, and Kant—from whom Otto derived the concept of thea priori nature of the numinous. However, the numinous does not appear to be a universally applicable category of experience, much lessa priori, and in some cases may distort religious experience. The example of Hinduism demonstrated how easily the concept of the numinous may (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rationality in early buddhist four fold logic.F. J. Hoffman - 1982 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 10 (4):309-337.
  • Divine witness.Minoru Hara - 2009 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 37 (3):253-272.
    When People were falsely accused, and yet there existed no human means to testify to the truth, to whom did they resort for the final judgment? In ancient India, it was a sort of ordeal ( divya ), which was inseparable from oath ( śapatha ) and act of truth ( satya-kriyā ). Here we present some examples and investigate who appear in these contexts. As a result, we could classify them into (1) mahā−bhuūta (fire, wind, water, etc.), (2) heavenly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What is dialectical logic?J. F. A. K. Benthem - 1979 - Erkenntnis 14 (3):333 - 347.
  • Mysticism.Jerome Gellman - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • Mysticism and rationality in India: the case of Vaisesika.Bronkhorst Johannes - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Patanjali and the Yoga sutras.Bronkhorst Johannes - unknown
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • On Buddhist logic.Adrian Kreutz - unknown
    This thesis is the attempt to find a logical model for, and trace the history of, the catuṣkoṭi as it developed in the Indo-Tibetan milieu and spread, via China, to Japan. After an introduction to the history and key-concepts of Buddhist philosophy, I will finish the first chapter with some methodological considerations about the general viability of comparative philosophy. Chapter §2 is devoted to a logical analysis of the catuṣkoṭi. Several attempts to model this fascinating piece of Buddhist philosophy with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The logic of the catuskoti.Graham Priest - 2010 - Comparative Philosophy 1 (2):24-54.
    In early Buddhist logic, it was standard to assume that for any state of a ff airs there were four possibilities: that it held, that it did not, both, or neither. This is the catuskoti (or tetralemma). Classical logicians have had a hard time mak­ing sense of this, but it makes perfectly good sense in the se­mantics of various paraconsistent logics, such as First Degree Entailment. Matters are more complicated for later Buddhist thinkers, such as Nagarjuna, who appear to suggest (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  • Whole set of volume 1 no 2 (2010) of comparative philosophy.Bo Mou - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark