Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Agency and surprise: learning at the limits of empathic‐imagination and liberal egalitarian political philosophy.Steven R. Smith - 2008 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 11 (1):25-40.
    Liberal egalitarians have been wary of being orientated by the empathetic understanding of others lest it offends the separateness of persons. This worry can be overcome by embracing second‐order as well as first‐order empathetic‐imagination, while doing so strengthens liberal‐egalitarian claims to treat all with equal concern and respect. ‘First‐order’ empathic‐imagination, which accesses objective knowledge about a person’s experience, is a necessary but not sufficient part of relating to others as agents. ‘Second‐order’ empathic‐imagination, encompassing a ‘disposition of surprise’ at an agent’s (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Citizenship and disability: incommensurable lives and well-being.Steven R. Smith - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (3):403-420.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Talents and distributive justice: some tensions.Mitja Sardoč & Tomaž Deželan - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):768-776.
    For much of its modern history, the notion of talent has been associated with the idea of ‘careers open to talent’. Its emancipatory promise of upward social mobility has radically transformed the distribution of advantaged social positions and has had a lasting influence on the very idea of social status itself. Nevertheless, unlike concepts traditionally associated with distributive justice, e.g. fairness, (in)equality, desert, equality of opportunity as well as justice itself, the notion of talent has received only limited examination. This (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Global justice, reciprocity, and the state.Andrea Sangiovanni - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):3–39.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   163 citations  
  • Denying reciprocity.David Jenkins - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory 15 (3):312-332.
    When individuals receive benefits as a result of the burdens assumed by other people, they are expected to make a return in similar form. To do otherwise is considered as a failure to treat those other people with appropriate respect. It is this which justifies the expectation that individuals share in the labour that is necessary to preserve just institutions and productive practices that characterise complex schemes of social cooperation. In this paper, I argue that where benefits do not meet (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Sharing with the vulnerable? The Vulnerability Objection and Vanderschraaf’s theory of justice as mutual advantage.Lina Eriksson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-17.
    The most recent major contribution to the literature on justice as mutual advantage is Peter Vanderschraaf’s book Strategic Justice. In this book, he develops a theory of justice as convention, where justice is those principles that rational, self-interested agents would choose to solve problems of partially conflicting interest. His theory is thus a kind of theory of justice as mutual advantage. A common criticism of theories of justice as mutual advantage is the Vulnerability Objection: if the principles of justice require (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Disability: a justice-based account.Jessica Begon - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 178 (3):935-962.
    Most people have a clear sense of what they mean by disability, and have little trouble identifying conditions they consider disabling. Yet providing a clear and consistent definition of disability is far from straightforward. Standardly, disability is understood as the restriction in our abilities to perform tasks, as a result of an impairment of normal physical or cognitive human functioning. However, which inabilities matter? We are all restricted by our bodies, and are all incapable of performing some tasks, but most (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations