Switch to: References

Citations of:

Rules and mention

Philosophical Quarterly 51 (205):455-473 (2001)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On a Neg‐Raising Fallacy in Determining Enthymematicity: If She Did not Believe or Want ….Katarzyna Paprzycka - 2014 - Metaphilosophy 45 (1):96-119.
    Many arguments that show p to be enthymematic (in an argument for q) rely on claims like “if one did not believe that p, one would not have a reason for believing that q.” Such arguments are susceptible to the neg-raising fallacy. We tend to interpret claims like “X does not believe that p” as statements of disbelief (X's belief that not-p) rather than as statements of withholding the belief that p. This article argues that there is a tendency to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Logical Expressivism and Carroll's Regress.Corine Besson - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 86:35-62.
    In this paper, I address a key argument in favour of logical expressivism, the view that knowing a logical principle such as Modus Ponens is not a cognitive state but a pro-attitude towards drawing certain types of conclusions from certain types of premises. The argument is that logical expressivism is the only view that can take us out of Lewis Carroll's Regress – which suggests that elementary deductive reasoning is impossible. I show that the argument does not hold scrutiny and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Dummett, Achilles and the tortoise.Pascal Engel - unknown
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations