Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Conceptions of self-determination in fourth/tenth-century muslim theology: Al-bāqillānī's theory of human acts in its historical context.Jan Thiele - 2016 - Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 26 (2):245-269.
    RésuméLa responsabilité individuelle de l'homme est une notion centrale en théologie musulmane. Or une justification rationnelle de notre responsabilité morale présuppose que nos actes sont d'une certaine manière sous notre contrôle. Pour les théologiens, il était donc important de formuler une théorie de l'acte humain qui tienne compte de l'autodétermination humaine. Cet article analyse les réflexions d'al-Bāqillānī au sujet de l'acte humain dans le contexte des discussions qui eurent lieu en son temps. Je récapitulerai brièvement la théorie muʿtazilite du libre (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Mereology in Kal'm A New Reading of the Proof from Accidents for Creation.Ayman Shihadeh - 2021 - Kader 19 (1):347-376.
    The objective of this article is twofold. First, it investigates mereology in medieval Islamic theology, particularly the theologians’ claim that the whole is identical to its parts and accordingly that at least some attributes common to the parts must by extension be attributed of the whole. This claim was refuted by philosophers and, from the eleventh century onwards, an increasing number of theologians. Second, it offers a new interpretation of the standard theological proof from accidents for creation ex nihilo, to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Les arguments analogiques dans la tradition du kalām : Abū l-Maꜥālī al-Juwaynī et au-delà.Abdurrahman Ali Mihirig - 2022 - Methodos 22.
    This article examines the development and critique of analogical arguments in the kalām tradition. There are two basic positions on analogical arguments: (i) one holds that if analogical arguments yield certainty, then they are analyzable as deductive inferences, rendering the analogy itself redundant. Proponents of this view thus hold that if the analogy is useful at all, it will never yield the certainty demanded in the rational sciences; (ii) another holds that the analogy remains useful even when the argument is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark