- Argumentation Theory and the conception of epistemic justification.Lilian Bermejo-Luque - 2009 - In Marcin Koszowy (ed.), Informal logic and argumentation theory. Białystok: University of Białystok. pp. 285--303.details
|
|
Analysis and Interpretation in the Exact Sciences: Essays in Honour of William Demopoulos.Melanie Frappier, Derek Brown & Robert DiSalle (eds.) - 2011 - Dordrecht and London: Springer.details
|
|
Why Must Incompatibility Be Symmetric?Ryan Simonelli - 2024 - Philosophical Quarterly 74 (2):658-682.details
|
|
The Theory of Questions, Epistemic Powers, and the Indexical Theory of Knowledge.Hector-Neri Castañeda - 1980 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):193-238.details
|
|
Understanding and Its Role in Inquiry.Benjamin T. Rancourt - unknowndetails
|
|
Normativity of Meaning: An Inferentialist Argument.Shuhei Shimamura & Tuomo Tiisala - 2023 - Synthese 202 (4):1-21.details
|
|
Logical Conventionalism and the Adoption Problem.Anandi Hattiangadi - 2023 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 97 (1):47-81.details
|
|
Belief Attribution as Indirect Communication.Christopher Gauker - 2021 - In Ladislav Koreň, Hans Bernhard Schmid, Preston Stovall & Leo Townsend (eds.), Groups, Norms and Practices: Essays on Inferentialism and Collective Intentionality. Cham: Springer. pp. 173-187.details
|
|
Understanding What We Ought and Shall Do: A Hyperstate Semantics for Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Intentional Sentences.Preston Stovall - 2021 - In Ladislav Koreň, Hans Bernhard Schmid, Preston Stovall & Leo Townsend (eds.), Groups, Norms and Practices: Essays on Inferentialism and Collective Intentionality. Cham: Springer. pp. 215-238.details
|
|
Grasp of concepts: common sense and expertise in an inferentialist framework.Pietro Salis - 2015 - In P. Piccari M. Bianca (ed.), Epistemology of Ordinary Knowledge. Cambridge Scholars Press. pp. 289-297.details
|
|
Wilfrid Sellars and the Foundations of Normativity.Peter Olen - 2016 - London, England: Palgrave-Macmillan.details
|
|
Arguing on the Toulmin Model: New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation.David Hitchcock & Bart Verheij (eds.) - 2006 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
The Dynamics of Thought.Peter Gardenfors - 2005 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Groundwork in the Theory of Argumentation: Selected Papers of J. Anthony Blair.John Anthony Blair - 2011 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.details
|
|
Securing the objectivity of relative facts in the quantum world.Richard A. Healey - 2022 - Foundations of Physics 52 (4):1-20.details
|
|
Shadows of Syntax: Revitalizing Logical and Mathematical Conventionalism.Jared Warren - 2020 - New York, USA: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Epistemologia dell'educazione. Pensiero critico, etica ed Epistemic Injustice.Alessia Marabini - 2020 - Rome: Aracne editore.details
|
|
Mathematical Pluralism.Edward N. Zalta - 2023 - Noûs.details
|
|
Rigid Designation and Anaphoric Theories of Reference.Michael P. Wolf - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 130 (2):351-375.details
|
|
Understanding beyond grasping propositions: A discussion of chess and fish.Daniel A. Wilkenfeld & Jennifer K. Hellmann - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 48:46-51.details
|
|
Objectually Understanding Informed Consent.Daniel A. Wilkenfeld - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 62 (1):33-56.details
|
|
Critical Notice.Fred Wilson - 1997 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (3):377-406.details
|
|
A Kernel of Truth: Outlining an Epistemology of Jokes.Thomas Wilk - 2023 - The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 4 (1):227-246.details
|
|
On epistemic conceptions of meaning: Use, meaning and normativity.Daniel Whiting - 2008 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):416-434.details
|
|
Between primitivism and naturalism: Brandom’s theory of meaning.Daniel Whiting - 2006 - Acta Analytica 21 (3):3-22.details
|
|
Quantifier Variance and Indefinite Extensibility.Jared Warren - 2017 - Philosophical Review 126 (1):81-122.details
|
|
Change of Logic, Change of Meaning.Jared Warren - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (2):421-442.details
|
|
Una Concepción pragmatista de Los derechos.Giovanni Tuzet - 2013 - Isonomía. Revista de Teoría y Filosofía Del Derecho 39:11-36.details
|
|
A Myth to Kill a Myth? On McDowell's Interpretation of Sellars' Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.Paolo Tripodi - 2012 - Theoria 79 (4):353-377.details
|
|
The fanciest sort of intentionality: Active inference, mindshaping and linguistic content.Remi Tison - 2022 - Philosophical Psychology 35:1-41.details
|
|
Epistemo-Semantic Coherentism: An Attitudinal View of Meaning Based on Epistemic Pragmatism.İskender Taşdelen - 2019 - Studia Semiotyczne 33 (1):59-82.details
|
|
Making Folk Psychology Explicit: The Relevance of Robert Brandom’s Philosophy for the Debate on Social Cognition.Derek W. Strijbos & Leon C. de Bruin - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (1):139-163.details
|
|
Characterizing generics are material inference tickets: a proof-theoretic analysis.Preston Stovall - 2019 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy (5):668-704.details
|
|
A Tale of Two Nortons.Patrick Skeels - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83:28-35.details
|
|
Sellars on the Function of Semantic Vocabulary.Lionel Shapiro - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (4):792-811.details
|
|
Intentional Relations and the Sideways‐on View: On McDowell's Critique of Sellars.Lionel Shapiro - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):300-319.details
|
|
Holismo confirmacional e subdeterminação no pensamento de Quine.Rogério Passos Severo - 2012 - Filosofia Unisinos 13 (2).details
|
|
A Hybrid Theory of Induction.Adrià Segarra - forthcoming - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.details
|
|
Jeux dialogiques et processus discursif. Conséquences du débat entre Habermas et Brandom.Yaël Sebban - 2020 - Dialogue 59 (2):305-344.details
|
|
Classical logic without bivalence.Tor Sandqvist - 2009 - Analysis 69 (2):211-218.details
|
|
The given and the hard problem of content.Pietro Salis - 2022 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-26.details
|
|
Discursive pluralism: Inferentialist expressivism and the integration challenge.Pietro Salis - 2023 - Metaphilosophy 54 (5):717-733.details
|
|
Vagueness in a Kind of Conflation.David Ripley - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (1):115-135.details
|
|
Blurring: An Approach to Conflation.David Ripley - 2018 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 59 (2):171-188.details
|
|
Meaning that Lives in Behavior: Sellars on Rule-Following.Santiago Rey - 2020 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28 (4):488-509.details
|
|
What are the drivers of induction? Towards a Material Theory+.Julian Reiss - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 83 (C):8-16.details
|
|
Causation in the sciences: An inferentialist account.Julian Reiss - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):769-777.details
|
|
Evaluating Inferences: the Nature and Role of Warrants.Robert C. Pinto - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):287-317.details
|
|
Enthymematic parsimony.Fabio Paglieri & John Woods - 2011 - Synthese 178 (3):461 - 501.details
|
|
What is the myth of the given?James R. O’Shea - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):10543-10567.details
|
|