Switch to: References

Citations of:

Truth and Meaning

In Ernest Lepore & Barry C. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press (2006)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. What is the Normativity of Meaning?Daniel Whiting - 2016 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 59 (3):219-238.
    There has been much debate over whether to accept the claim that meaning is normative. One obstacle to making progress in that debate is that it is not always clear what the claim amounts to. In this paper, I try to resolve a dispute between those who advance the claim concerning how it should be understood. More specifically, I critically examine two competing conceptions of the normativity of meaning, rejecting one and defending the other. Though the paper aims to settle (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  • The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language.Andrew Jorgensen - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):303-306.
    This Article is a review of Barry Smith and Ernest Lepore's "Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language".
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Semantic Theories, Linguistic Essences, and Knowledge of Meaning.Nick Haverkamp & Miguel Hoeltje - 2021 - Synthese 199 (5-6):14459-14490.
    This paper argues, first, that the information problem poses a foundational challenge to mainstream semantics. It proposes, second, to address this problem by drawing on notions from Kit Fine’s essentialist framework. More specifically, it claims that the information problem can be avoided by strengthening standard truth theories, employing an operator expressing the notion of a relative constitutive semantic requirement. As a result, the paper proposes to construe semantic theories as theories of semantic requirements, and semantic knowledge as knowledge of such (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Is meaning cognized?David Balcarras - 2023 - Mind and Language 38 (5):1276-1295.
    In this article, I defend an account of linguistic comprehension on which meaning is not cognized, or on which we do not tacitly know our language's semantics. On this view, sentence comprehension is explained instead by our capacity to translate sentences into the language of thought. I explain how this view can explain our capacity to correctly interpret novel utterances, and then I defend it against several standing objections.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations