Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Underestimation of prior remembering and susceptibility to false memories: Two sides of the same coin?Linsey Raymaekers, Maarten J. V. Peters, Tom Smeets, Latifa Abidi & Harald Merckelbach - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1144-1153.
    In two studies, we explored whether susceptibility to false memories and the underestimation of prior memories tap overlapping memory phenomena. Study 1 investigated this issue by administering the Deese/Roediger–McDermott task and the forgot-it-all-along task to an undergraduate sample . It was furthermore explored how performances on these tasks correlate with clinically relevant traits such as fantasy proneness, dissociative experiences, and cognitive efficiency. Results show that FIA and DRM performances are relatively independent from each other, suggesting that these measures empirically apparently (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The classification of recovered memories: A cautionary note.Linsey Raymaekers, Tom Smeets, Maarten Jv Peters, Henry Otgaar & Harald Merckelbach - 2012 - Consciousness and Cognition 21 (4):1640-1643.
    Traditionally, recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse have been classified as those emerging spontaneously versus those surfacing during the course of suggestive therapy. There are indications that reinterpretation of memories might be a third route to recovered memories. Thus, recovered memories do not form a homogeneous category. Nevertheless, the conceptual distinctions between the various types of recovered memories remain difficult for researchers and clinicians. With this in mind, the current study explored whether recovered memories can be reliably classified. We found (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What are the benefits of memory distortion?Jordi Fernández - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:536-547.