Switch to: References

Citations of:

Moral identity, integrity, and personal responsibility

In Darcia Narvaez & Daniel Lapsley (eds.), Personality, Identity, and Character. Cambridge University Press. pp. 316 (2009)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Behavioral Ethics: A Critique and a Proposal.Carol Frogley Ellertson, Marc-Charles Ingerson & Richard N. Williams - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 138 (1):145-159.
    In behavioral ethics today, there is debate as to which theory of moral development is the best for understanding ethical decision making, thereby facilitating ethical behavior. This debate between behavioral ethicists has been profoundly influenced by the field of moral psychology. Unfortunately, in the course of this marriage between moral psychology and business ethics and subsequent internal debate, a simple but critical understanding of human being in the field of management has been obscured; i.e., that morality is not a secondary (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • When Moral Personality and Moral Ideology Meet Ethical Leadership: A Three-Way Interaction Model.Pei-Ju Chuang & Su-Fen Chiu - 2018 - Ethics and Behavior 28 (1):45-69.
    We propose a three-way interaction model based on substitutes for leadership theory to explore the relationship among ethical leadership, moral personality, and moral ideology on two types of employee voluntary behaviors. Results from a sample of 218 supervisor–subordinate dyads indicate that moral personality attenuates the relationship between ethical leadership and employee voluntary behaviors. Idealism serves as the boundary condition for the moderating effect of moral personality. However, relativism only serves as the boundary condition for the moderating effect of moral personality (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • “We’re Just Geeks”: Disciplinary Identifications Among Business Students and Their Implications for Personal Responsibility.Maribel Blasco - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 178 (1):279-302.
    This research shows how business students’ disciplinary specializations can affect their sense of personal responsibility by providing rationalizations for moral disengagement. It thereby conceptualizes business students’ disciplinary specializations as a key dimension of the business school responsibility learning environment. Students use four main rationalizations to displace responsibility variously away from their own disciplinary specializations, to claim responsibility as the prerogative of their specialization, and to shiftirresponsibility onto disciplinary out-groups. Yet despite their disciplinary identifications, students largely rationalized that their sense of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark