Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.) - 2024 - Springer.
    This open access book is a superb collection of some fifteen chapters inspired by Schroeder-Heister's groundbreaking work, written by leading experts in the field, plus an extensive autobiography and comments on the various contributions by Schroeder-Heister himself. For several decades, Peter Schroeder-Heister has been a central figure in proof-theoretic semantics, a field of study situated at the interface of logic, theoretical computer science, natural-language semantics, and the philosophy of language. -/- The chapters of which this book is composed discuss the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Eight Rules for Implication Elimination.Michael Arndt - 2024 - In Thomas Piecha & Kai F. Wehmeier (eds.), Peter Schroeder-Heister on Proof-Theoretic Semantics. Springer. pp. 239-273.
    Eight distinct rules for implication in the antecedent for the sequent calculus, one of which being Gentzen’s standard rule, can be derived by successively applying a number of cuts to the logical ground sequent A → B, A ⇒ B. A naive translation into natural deduction collapses four of those rules onto the standard implication elimination rule, and the remaining four rules onto the general elimination rule. This collapse is due to the fact that the difference between a formula occurring (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • A natural extension of natural deduction.Peter Schroeder-Heister - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1284-1300.
    The framework of natural deduction is extended by permitting rules as assumptions which may be discharged in the course of a derivation. this leads to the concept of rules of higher levels and to a general schema for introduction and elimination rules for arbitrary n-ary sentential operators. with respect to this schema, (functional) completeness "or", "if..then" and absurdity is proved.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  • On Inversion Principles.Enrico Moriconi & Laura Tesconi - 2008 - History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (2):103-113.
    The idea of an ?inversion principle?, and the name itself, originated in the work of Paul Lorenzen in the 1950s, as a method to generate new admissible rules within a certain syntactic context. Some fifteen years later, the idea was taken up by Dag Prawitz to devise a strategy of normalization for natural deduction calculi (this being an analogue of Gentzen's cut-elimination theorem for sequent calculi). Later, Prawitz used the inversion principle again, attributing it with a semantic role. Still working (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • Proof Theory and Meaning.B. G. Sundholm - unknown
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations