Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. A Plea for Consistency in Ethical Review.David D. Pothier & Corné-Louise Bredenkamp - 2006 - Research Ethics 2 (3):109-110.
    When considering submissions ethics committees should be consistent in all aspects of their review. A wide variation in performance is likely to result in the unfair dismissal of good research on the one hand with inadequate ethical review on the other, neither of which is acceptable. The recent annual reports for UK MRECs suggest that the level of unfavourable opinion ranges from 6.9% to 24.2% Although a certain level of inconsistency is inherent in the system of ethical review there is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The emergence and evolution of the expression “conflict of interests” in science : A historical overview, 1880–2006.Yves Gingras & Pierre-Marc Gosselin - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):337-343.
    The tendency is strong to take the notion of “conflict of interests” for granted as if it had an invariant meaning and an ethical content independent of the historical context. It is doubtful however, from an historical and sociological point of view, that many of the cases now considered as instances of “conflicts of interests” would also have been conceived and perceived as such in, say, the 1930s. The idea of a “conflict of interests” presupposes that there are indeed interests (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•