Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Negation as Cancellation, Connexive Logic, and qLPm.Heinrich Wansing - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):476-488.
    In this paper, we shall consider the so-called cancellation view of negation and the inferential role of contradictions. We will discuss some of the problematic aspects of negation as cancellation, such as its original presentation by Richard and Valery Routley and its role in motivating connexive logic. Furthermore, we will show that the idea of inferential ineffectiveness of contradictions can be conceptually separated from the cancellation model of negation by developing a system we call qLPm, a combination of Graham Priest’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Relevant logics and their semantics remain viable and undamaged by Lewis's equivocation charge.R. Routley & R. K. Meyer - 1983 - Topoi 2 (2):205-215.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Bayesian confirmation, connexivism and an unkindness of ravens.Elisangela Ramirez - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):449-475.
    Bayesian confirmation theories might be the best standing theories of confirmation to date, but they are certainly not paradox-free. Here I recognize that BCTs’ appeal mainly comes from the fact that they capture some of our intuitions about confirmation better than those the- ories that came before them and that the superiority of BCTs is suffi- ciently justified by those advantages. Instead, I will focus on Sylvan and Nola’s claim that it is desirable that our best theory of confirmation be (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Connexive logics. An overview and current trends.Hitoshi Omori & Heinrich Wansing - forthcoming - Logic and Logical Philosophy:1.
    In this introduction, we offer an overview of main systems developed in the growing literature on connexive logic, and also point to a few topics that seem to be collecting attention of many of those interested in connexive logic. We will also make clear the context to which the papers in this special issue belong and contribute.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Nonetheism: A Non-atheistic Account of a Non-existent God.Paul Kabay - 2015 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 20 (1):7-28.
    I briefly defend a view I call nonetheism: the claim that God is a non- existent item. I develop a defense that might be acceptable to a theist, but I also note that arguments for atheism would also support this claim. As such, nonetheism is a form of theism that is actually supported by the case for atheism. I begin by showing that it is possible for there to be a non-existent object—that such an idea is coherent. I then argue (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Minimalism and the dialetheic challenge.B. Armour-Garb & Jc Beall - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (3):383 – 401.
    Minimalists, following Horwich, claim that all that can be said about truth is comprised by all and only the nonparadoxical instances of (E) p is true iff p. It is, accordingly, standard in the literature on truth and paradox to ask how the minimalist will restrict (E) so as to rule out paradox-inducing sentences (alternatively: propositions). In this paper, we consider a prior question: On what grounds does the minimalist restrict (E) so as to rule out paradox-inducing sentences and, thereby, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation