Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Copernicus and Fracastoro: the dedicatory letters to Pope Paul III, the history of astronomy, and the quest for patronage.Miguel A. Granada & Dario Tessicini - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 36 (3):431-476.
    Copernicus’s De revolutionibus and Girolamo Fracastoro’s Homocentrica were both addressed to Pope Paul III. Their dedicatory letters represent a rhetorical exercise in advocating an astronomical reform and an attempt to obtain the papal favour. Following on from studies carried out by Westman and Barker & Goldstein, this paper deals with cultural, intellectual and scientific motives of both texts, and aims at underlining possible relations between them, such as that Copernicus knew of Fracastoro’s Homocentrica, and that at least part of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Calendar Reform and World Chronology: Pierre De Lille’s Tria Calendaria Parva(1529).Nicolae Virastau - 2019 - Isis 110 (3):441-459.
    This essay explores the astronomical works of Pierre de Lille, a little-known French participant in the debates on calendar reform during the Fifth Lateran Council (1512–1517). It argues that astrological ideas coupled with eschatological beliefs motivated his astronomical propositions to reform the Julian calendar. De Lille conceived the calendar solar year as a unit of a great cosmic year spanning 7,153 years, the duration that he assigned to the now-obsolete theory of the motion of trepidation of the eighth sphere. Although (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The place of Edward Gresham's Astrostereon(1603) in the discussion on cosmology and the Bible in the early modern period.Barbara Bienias - 2020 - British Journal for the History of Science 53 (4):417-442.
    This article situates Edward Gresham'sAstrostereon, or A Discourse of the Falling of the Planet(1603), a little-known English astronomical treatise, in the context of the cosmo-theological debate on the reconciliation of heliocentrism with the Bible, triggered by the publication of Nicholas Copernicus'sDe revolutionibus orbium coelestiumin 1543. Covering the period from the appearance of the ‘First Account’ of Copernican views presented in Georg Joachim Rheticus'sNarratio Prima(1540) to the composition ofAstrostereonin 1603, this paper places Edward Gresham's commentary and exegesis against the background of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Galileo y Urbano VIII. La trama del equívoco.Antonio Beltrán Marí - 2006 - Endoxa 1 (21):35.