Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Unequal treatment of human research subjects.David B. Resnik - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (1):23-32.
    Unequal treatment of human research subjects is a significant ethical concern, because justice in research involving human subjects requires equal protection of rights and equal protection from harm and exploitation. Disputes sometimes arise concerning the issue of unequal treatment of research subjects. Allegedly unequal treatment occurs when subjects are treated differently and there is a genuine dispute concerning the appropriateness of equal treatment. Patently unequal treatment occurs when subjects are treated differently and there is not a genuine dispute about the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The goals of public health: An integrated, multidimensional model.Christian Munthe - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):39-52.
    While promoting population health has been the classic goal of public health practice and policy, in recent decades, new objectives in terms of autonomy and equality have been introduced. These different goals are analysed, and it is demonstrated how they may conflict severly in several ways, leaving serious unclarities both regarding the normative issue of what goal should be pursued by public health, what that implies in practical terms, and the descriptive issue of what goal that actually is pursued in (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Ethical Issues in Secondary Uses of Human Biological Materials from Mass Disasters.Bartha Maria Knoppers, Madelaine Saginur & Howard Cash - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):352-365.
    In the trauma surrounding mass disasters, the need to identify victims accurately and as soon as possible is critical. DNA identification testing is increasingly used to identify human bodies and remains where the deceased cannot be identified by traditional means. This form of testing compares DNA taken from the body of the deceased with DNA taken from their personal items or from close biological relatives. DNA identification testing was used to identify the victims of the terrorist attack on the World (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ethical Issues in Secondary Uses of Human Biological Materials from Mass Disasters.Bartha Maria Knoppers, Madelaine Saginur & Howard Cash - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):352-365.
    This paper addresses the ethical issues of secondary uses of samples collected for identification purposes following mass disasters. It studies norms governing secondary use of samples , ultimately concluding that limited secondary research uses of these samples should be permissible.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Ethical Guidance for Hard Decisions: A Critical Review of Early International COVID-19 ICU Triage Guidelines.Yves Saint James Aquino, Wendy A. Rogers, Jackie Leach Scully, Farah Magrabi & Stacy M. Carter - 2022 - Health Care Analysis 30 (2):163-195.
    This article provides a critical comparative analysis of the substantive and procedural values and ethical concepts articulated in guidelines for allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic. We identified 21 local and national guidelines written in English, Spanish, German and French; applicable to specific and identifiable jurisdictions; and providing guidance to clinicians for decision making when allocating critical care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. US guidelines were not included, as these had recently been reviewed elsewhere. Information was extracted from each (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Threshold considerations in fair allocation of health resources: Justice beyond scarcity.Allen Andrew A. Alvarez - 2007 - Bioethics 21 (8):426–438.
    Application of egalitarian and prioritarian accounts of health resource allocation in low‐income countries have both been criticized for implying distribution outcomes that allow decreasing/undermining health gains and for tolerating unacceptable standards of health care and health status that result from such allocation schemes. Insufficient health care and severe deprivation of health resources are difficult to accept even when justified by aggregative efficiency or legitimized by fair deliberative process in pursuing equality and priority oriented outcomes. I affirm the sufficientarian argument that, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations