Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Klinische Ethik systemisch betrachtet – Vom Einfluss systemischer Grundannahmen und Methoden auf die Gestaltung einer effektiven Ethikberatung.Katharina Woellert - 2022 - Ethik in der Medizin 34 (4):529-548.
    Zusammenfassung Krankenhäuser müssen sich an der ethischen Qualität ihrer Versorgung messen lassen. Es geht dabei um einen Zustand, in dem allgemein anerkannte moralische Normen in der Patient:innenversorgung konsequent berücksichtigt werden. Damit sind zwei Ebenen angesprochen: die der ethisch-normativen Deutung und die der Gestaltung intra- und interpersonaler Prozesse. Die Klinische Ethik ist die Disziplin, die in der Verbindung beider ihre zentrale Aufgabe sieht. Um sie zu erfüllen, muss Ethikarbeit auf der Basis komplexer Kompetenzen erfolgen. Neben fundiertem Ethikwissen ist das Beherrschen von (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Systemic approach to clinical ethics—impact of systems thinking and practice on the design of effective ethics consultations.Katharina Woellert - 2022 - Ethik in der Medizin 34 (4):529-548.
    Definition of the problemQuality of care also includes a professional approach to ethical challenges. This involves the moral interpretation of an issue and the management of intra- and interpersonal reflection processes. Combining both is the central task of clinical ethics consultation (CEC). Despite its importance only a few studies have dealt with the appropriate methods for steering reflection processes.ArgumentsCEC requires a theory-based and methodological approach. The argumentation shows the effects that systems theory and systemic methods have on the effectiveness of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Do Clinical Ethics Consultants Have a Fiduciary Responsibility to the Patient?Jeffrey P. Spike - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):13 - 15.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 13-15, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Taxonomizing Views of Clinical Ethics Expertise.Erica K. Salter & Abram Brummett - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (11):50-61.
    Our aim in this article is to bring some clarity to the clinical ethics expertise debate by critiquing and replacing the taxonomy offered by the Core Competencies report. The orienting question for our taxonomy is: Can clinical ethicists offer justified, normative recommendations for active patient cases? Views that answer “no” are characterized as a “negative” view of clinical ethics expertise and are further differentiated based on (a) why they think ethicists cannot give justified normative recommendations and (b) what they think (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  • A Place for Ethics? A Place for Advocacy?Robin L. Pierce - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):17 - 18.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 17-18, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Religion, Authenticity, and Clinical Ethics Consultation.J. Clint Parker - 2019 - HEC Forum 31 (2):103-117.
    A clinical ethics consultant may, at times, be called upon to make independent substantive moral judgments and then offer justifications for those judgments. A CEC does not act unprofessionally by utilizing background beliefs that are religious in nature to justify those judgments. It is important, however, for a CEC to make such judgments authentically and, when asked, to offer up one’s reasons for why one believes the judgment is true in a transparent fashion.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Clinical Ethics Consultation After God: Implications for Advocacy and Neutrality.J. Clint Parker - 2018 - HEC Forum 30 (2):103-115.
    In After God: Morality and Bioethics in a Secular Age, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Jr. explores the broad implications for moral reasoning once a culture has lost a God’s-eye perspective. In this paper, I focus on the implications of Engelhardt’s views for clinical ethics consultation. I begin by examining the question of whether clinical ethics consultants should advocate a particular viewpoint and/or process during consultations or adopt a neutral stance. I then examine the implications of Engelhardt’s views for this question. Finally, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Moral Conflicts and Religious Convictions: What Role for Clinical Ethics Consultants?John C. Moskop - 2019 - HEC Forum 31 (2):141-150.
    Moral conflicts over medical treatment that are the result of differences in fundamental moral commitments of the stakeholders, including religiously grounded commitments, can present difficult challenges for clinical ethics consultants. This article begins with a case example that poses such a conflict, then examines how consultants might use different approaches to clinical ethics consultation in an effort to facilitate the resolution of conflicts of this kind. Among the approaches considered are the authoritarian approach, the pure consensus approach, and the ethics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Sources of bias in clinical ethics case deliberation.Morten Magelssen, Reidar Pedersen & Reidun Førde - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):678-682.
    A central task for clinical ethics consultants and committees (CEC) is providing analysis of, and advice on, prospective or retrospective clinical cases. However, several kinds of biases may threaten the integrity, relevance or quality of the CEC's deliberation. Bias should be identified and, if possible, reduced or counteracted. This paper provides a systematic classification of kinds of bias that may be present in a CEC's case deliberation. Six kinds of bias are discussed, with examples, as to their significance and risk (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Clinical Ethics Consultants: Advocates for Both Patients and Clinicians.Alexander A. Kon - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):15 - 17.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 15-17, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Keeping an Eye on Power in Maintaining Racial Oppression and Race-Based Violence.Katrina Karkazis, Laura Mamo & Ugo Edu - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):25-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Racism and Bioethics: Are We Part of the Problem?Anita Ho - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):23-25.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Mediation and Advocacy.Autumn Fiester - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):10 - 11.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 10-11, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • Empowering, Teaching, and Occasionally Advocating: Clinical Ethics Consultants' Duties to All of the Participants in the Process.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):11 - 13.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 11-13, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Will the Last Health Care Professional to Forgo Patient Advocacy Please Call an Ethics Consult?William Lawrence Allen & Ray Edward Moseley - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (8):19 - 20.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 8, Page 19-20, August 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The four-principle formulation of common morality is at the core of bioethics mediation method.Shahram Ahmadi Nasab Emran - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (3):371-377.
    Bioethics mediation is increasingly used as a method in clinical ethics cases. My goal in this paper is to examine the implicit theoretical assumptions of the bioethics mediation method developed by Dubler and Liebman. According to them, the distinguishing feature of bioethics mediation is that the method is useful in most cases of clinical ethics in which conflict is the main issue, which implies that there is either no real ethical issue or if there were, they are not the key (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark