Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why Do People With Depression Use Faulty Emotion Regulation Strategies?Sunkyung Yoon & Jonathan Rottenberg - 2019 - Emotion Review 12 (2):118-128.
    Why do people with psychopathology use less adaptive and more maladaptive strategies for negative emotions if such usage has self-destructive consequences? Although researchers have examined the reasons for people’s engagement in maladaptive “behaviors,” such as nonsuicidal self-injury, surprisingly little attention has been paid to the reasons why people might endorse maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. This article addresses this question, focusing on the case of depression, evaluating an array of 10 possible explanations. After considering the existing evidence, we provide a blueprint (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Emotion Regulation in Current and Remitted Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Endre Visted, Jon Vøllestad, Morten Birkeland Nielsen & Elisabeth Schanche - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Diminished Anticipatory and Consummatory Pleasure in Dysphoria: Evidence From an Experience Sampling Study.Xu Li, Yu-Ting Zhang, Zhi-Jing Huang, Xue-Lei Chen, Feng-Hui Yuan & Xiao-Jun Sun - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reflect on emotional events from an observer’s perspective: a meta-analysis of experimental studies.Lin Guo - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (8):1531-1554.
    Self-distancing has been proposed as an emotion regulation strategy to reduce the duration and intensity of emotions. This meta-analysis synthesised 48 studies and 102 effect sizes examining the effects of self-distancing on emotion regulation. The results showed an overall significant, small effect of self-distancing in attenuating emotional responses (Hedges’ g = −0.26, 95%CI: [−0.36, −0.15]). Moderator analyses highlighted the efficacy of one intervention feature: approach. Stronger effect was associated with the visual and verbal approach to process emotional events, in comparison (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The persistence of hedonically-based mood repair among young offspring at high- and low-risk for depression.Shimrit Daches, Ilya Yaroslavsky & Maria Kovacs - 2019 - Cognition and Emotion 34 (3):568-580.
    The aim of the present study was to examine whether offspring at high and low familial risk for depression differ in the immediate and more lasting behavioural and physiological effects of hedonica...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Individual differences in physiological flexibility predict spontaneous avoidance.Amelia Aldao, Katherine L. Dixon-Gordon & Andres De Los Reyes - 2016 - Cognition and Emotion 30 (5).