- Conciliatory Reasoning, Self-Defeat, and Abstract Argumentation.Aleks Https://Orcidorg Knoks - 2023 - Review of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):740-787.details
|
|
Logical Modes of Attack in Argumentation Networks.Dov M. Gabbay & Artur S. D’Avila Garcez - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2):199-230.details
|
|
Analysis of the Talmudic Argumentum A Fortiori Inference Rule (Kal Vachomer) using Matrix Abduction.M. Abraham, Dov M. Gabbay & U. Schild - 2009 - Studia Logica 92 (3):281-364.details
|
|
Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.details
|
|
Working on the argument pipeline: Through flow issues between natural language argument, instantiated arguments, and argumentation frameworks.Adam Wyner, Tom van Engers & Anthony Hunter - 2016 - Argument and Computation 7 (1):69-89.details
|
|
Senses of ‘argument’ in instantiated argumentation frameworks.Adam Wyner, Trevor Bench-Capon, Paul Dunne & Federico Cerutti - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (1):50-72.details
|
|
A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation.Yining Wu, Martin Caminada & Dov M. Gabbay - 2009 - Studia Logica 93 (2-3):383-403.details
|
|
Combining argumentation and bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis.Matt Williams & Jon Williamson - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (1-2):155-178.details
|
|
Speech Act Rules for Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):279-304.details
|
|
Some Artificial Intelligence Tools for Argument Evaluation: An Introduction.Douglas Walton - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):317-340.details
|
|
Reasoning about knowledge using defeasible logic.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Argument and Computation 2 (2-3):131 - 155.details
|
|
Jumping to a Conclusion: Fallacies and Standards of Proof.Douglas Walton & Thomas F. Gordon - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (2):215-243.details
|
|
Is there a burden of questioning?Douglas Walton - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (1):1-43.details
|
|
Formalization of the ad hominem argumentation scheme.Douglas Walton - 2010 - Journal of Applied Logic 8 (1):1-21.details
|
|
Burden of Proof in a Modified Hamblin Dialogue System.Douglas Walton - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (4):279-304.details
|
|
Norm-system revision: theory and application. [REVIEW]Audun Stolpe - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):247-283.details
|
|
Computing Generalized Specificity.Frieder Stolzenburg, Alejandro J. García, Carlos I. Chesñevar & Guillermo R. Simari - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (1):87-113.details
|
|
Legality policies and theories of legality: From bananas to radbruch's formula.Giovanni Sartor - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):218-243.details
|
|
Probabilistic abstract argumentation: an investigation with Boltzmann machines.Régis Riveret, Dimitrios Korkinof, Moez Draief & Jeremy Pitt - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (2):178-218.details
|
|
Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents.Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo & Giovanni Sartor - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (4):383-420.details
|
|
Argumentation with justified preferences.Sung-Jun Pyon - forthcoming - Argument and Computation:1-46.details
|
|
Relating protocols for dynamic dispute with logics for defeasible argumentation.Henry Prakken - 2001 - Synthese 127 (1-2):187-219.details
|
|
Reconstructing Popov v. Hayashi in a framework for argumentation with structured arguments and Dungean semantics.Henry Prakken - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (1):57-82.details
|
|
On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law.Henry Prakken - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 25 (3):341-363.details
|
|
Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence 227 (C):214-245.details
|
|
Argumentation Without Arguments.Henry Prakken - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):171-184.details
|
|
An exercise in formalising teleological case-based reasoning.Henry Prakken - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):113-133.details
|
|
A formal model of adjudication dialogues.Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (3):305-328.details
|
|
An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.Henry Prakken - 2010 - Argument and Computation 1 (2):93-124.details
|
|
An appreciation of John Pollock's work on the computational study of argument.Henry Prakken & John Horty - 2012 - Argument and Computation 3 (1):1 - 19.details
|
|
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning.H. Prakken & G. Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):331-368.details
|
|
Remedial interchange, contrary-to-duty obligation and commutation.Xavier Parent - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (3):345-375.details
|
|
Moral particularism in the light of deontic logic.Xavier Parent - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):75-98.details
|
|
Argumentation frameworks with necessities and their relationship with logic programs.Farid Nouioua & Sara Boutouhami - 2023 - Argument and Computation 14 (1):17-58.details
|
|
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks.Sanjay Modgil - 2009 - Artificial Intelligence 173 (9-10):901-934.details
|
|
A general account of argumentation with preferences.Sanjay Modgil & Henry Prakken - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence 195 (C):361-397.details
|
|
From Berman and Hafner’s teleological context to Baude and Sachs’ interpretive defaults: an ontological challenge for the next decades of AI and Law.Ronald P. Loui - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 24 (4):371-385.details
|
|
Strong admissibility for abstract dialectical frameworks.Atefeh Keshavarzi Zafarghandi, Rineke Verbrugge & Bart Verheij - 2022 - Argument and Computation 13 (3):249-289.details
|
|
Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning.John F. Horty - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):1-28.details
|
|
A hybrid formal theory of arguments, stories and criminal evidence.Floris J. Bex, Peter J. van Koppen, Henry Prakken & Bart Verheij - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (2):123-152.details
|
|
Deontic logics for prioritized imperatives.Jörg Hansen - 2006 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (1-2):1-34.details
|
|
The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof.Thomas F. Gordon, Henry Prakken & Douglas Walton - 2007 - Artificial Intelligence 171 (10-15):875-896.details
|
|
Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: Postulates and properties.Nikos Gorogiannis & Anthony Hunter - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (9-10):1479-1497.details
|
|
Computing Generalized Specificity.Frieder Stolzenberg, Alejandro Javier Garcia, Carlos Ivan Chesñevar & Guillermo Ricardo Simari - 2003 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 13 (1):87-113.details
|
|
The winter, the summer and the summer dream of artificial intelligence in law: Presidential address to the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law.Enrico Francesconi - 2022 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 30 (2):147-161.details
|
|
An approach to decision making based on dynamic argumentation systems.Edgardo Ferretti, Luciano H. Tamargo, Alejandro J. García, Marcelo L. Errecalde & Guillermo R. Simari - 2017 - Artificial Intelligence 242 (C):107-131.details
|
|
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results.Paul E. Dunne, Anthony Hunter, Peter McBurney, Simon Parsons & Michael Wooldridge - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence 175 (2):457-486.details
|
|
Two party immediate response disputes: Properties and efficiency.Paul E. Dunne & T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 149 (2):221-250.details
|
|
The modular logic of private international law.Phan Minh Dung & Giovanni Sartor - 2011 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 19 (2-3):233-261.details
|
|
Fundamental properties of attack relations in structured argumentation with priorities.Phan Minh Dung & Phan Minh Thang - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence 255 (C):1-42.details
|
|