Switch to: References

Citations of:

Aseity as relational problematic

Sophia 28 (2):13-25 (1989)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Idealist Origins: 1920s and Before.Martin Davies & Stein Helgeby - 2014 - In Graham Oppy & Nick Trakakis (eds.), History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 15-54.
    This paper explores early Australasian philosophy in some detail. Two approaches have dominated Western philosophy in Australia: idealism and materialism. Idealism was prevalent between the 1880s and the 1930s, but dissipated thereafter. Idealism in Australia often reflected Kantian themes, but it also reflected the revival of interest in Hegel through the work of ‘absolute idealists’ such as T. H. Green, F. H. Bradley, and Henry Jones. A number of the early New Zealand philosophers were also educated in the idealist tradition (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  • Religious Concepts of 'World': Comparative Metaphysical Perspectives. [REVIEW]Douglas Pratt - 1992 - Sophia 31 (3):74-88.
  • Analyzing Aseity.Sarah Adams & Jon Robson - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-17.
    The doctrine of divine aseity has played a significant role in the development of classical theism. However, very little attention has been paid in recent years to the question of how precisely aseity should be characterized. We argue that this neglect is unwarranted since extant characterizations of this central divine attribute quickly encounter difficulties. In particular, we present a new argument to show that the most widely accepted contemporary account of aseity is inconsistent. We then consider the prospects for developing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation