Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ted Cohen.Lauren Olin - 2020 - The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 1 (1):257-259.
    Despite sustained philosophical attention, no theory of humor claims general acceptance. Drawing on the resources provided by intentional systems theory, this article first outlines an approach to investigating humor based on the idea of a comic stance, then sketches the Dismissal Theory of Humor that has resulted from pursuing that approach. According to the DTH, humor manifests in cases where the future-directed significance of anticipatory failures is dismissed. Mirth, on this view, is the reward people get for declining to update (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Richard Vagnino and Lauren Olin: Isn’t That Clever: A Philosophical Account of Humor and Comedy, Steven Gimbel. Routledge, 2017. pp. 208. [REVIEW]Lauren Olin & Richard Vagnino - 2020 - The Philosophy of Humor Yearbook 1 (1):285-287.
    Despite sustained philosophical attention, no theory of humor claims general acceptance. Drawing on the resources provided by intentional systems theory, this article first outlines an approach to investigating humor based on the idea of a comic stance, then sketches the Dismissal Theory of Humor that has resulted from pursuing that approach. According to the DTH, humor manifests in cases where the future-directed significance of anticipatory failures is dismissed. Mirth, on this view, is the reward people get for declining to update (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Production and judgment of “humor” by schizophrenics and college students.Peter L. Derks, Harry M. Leichtman & Patrick J. Carroll - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (3):300-302.
  • Is this a joke? The philosophy of humour.Alan Roberts - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Sussex
    In this thesis, I address the metaphysical question `What is humour?' and the ethical question `When is humour immoral?' Consulting a dictionary reveals a circle of definitions between `amusement', `funniness', and `humour'. So I split the metaphysical question `What is humour?' into three questions: `What is amusement?', `What is funniness?' and `What is humour?' By critically analysing then synthesising recent research in philosophy, psychology and linguistics, I give the following answers: x amuses y if and only if: y is in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark