Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why kinship is progeneratively constrained: Extending anthropology.Robert A. Wilson - 2022 - Synthese 200 (2):1-20.
    The conceptualisation of kinship and its study remain contested within anthropology. This paper draws on recent cognitive science, developmental cognitive psychology, and the philosophy of science to offer a novel argument for a view of kinship as progeneratively or reproductively constrained. I shall argue that kinship involves a form of extended cognition that incorporates progenerative facts, going on to show how the resulting articulation of kinship’s progenerative nature can be readily expressed by an influential conception of kinds, the homeostatic property (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Kinmaking, Progeneration, and Ethnography.Robert A. Wilson - 2022 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 91 (C):77-85.
    Philosophers of biology and biologists themselves for the most part assume that the concept of kin is progenerative: what makes two individuals kin is a direct or indirect function of reproduction. Derivatively, kinship might likewise be presumed to be progenerative in nature. Yet a prominent view of kinship in contemporary cultural anthropology is a kind of constructivism or performativism that rejects such progenerativist views. This paper critically examines an influential line of thinking used to critique progenerativism and support performativism that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Kinship Revisited.Nicholas Evans, Stephen Levinson & Kim Sterelny - 2021 - Biological Theory 16 (3):123-126.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations