Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Perelman’s phenomenology of rhetoric: Foucault contests Chomsky’s complaint about media communicology in the age of Trump polemic.Richard L. Lanigan - 2019 - Semiotica 2019 (229):273-328.
    The analysis explores the main arguments of Noam Chomsky’s short book,Media Controlthat also reprints the monograph “The Journalist from Mars: How the ‘War on Terror’ Should Be Reported.” The problematic is Aristotelian rhetoric and Enlightenment rationality (justice) in civic discourse (Lógos) as compared to the thematic of dialogic reasonableness (Eulógos). Chomsky’s assumption of, and critique of, “old rhetoric” [Aristotle’srhētorikḗ] is followed by a discussion of Chiam Perelman’s “new rhetoric” [presocraticpoiētikḗ/epideiktikos / gērys] and his “incarnate adherence” (givingvoiceto) concept of the Universal (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Reasonable and the Sensible: Toward a Rhetorical Theory of Justice.Don J. Kraemer - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (2):207-230.
    Rhetoric, like any other practice, is always to be used to serve the ends of justice, and for that alone.People will be responsible for the needs of others only when they are responsive to the feelings of need, anxiety, and desire in real other people who work in real material conditions. This direct response will take place only when people are fully responsive to, and fully responsible for, their own feelings. This responsibility for individual feeling, for full complexity and depth (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Reasonable and Rational: Renewed Loci for Rhetorical Justice.Don J. Kraemer - 2016 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 49 (2):173-195.
    Normative philosophy believes that argumentation concerning values is rational because there is a deeper value to which all are committed. Citing Ronald Dworkin’s 1977’s Taking Rights Seriously, Will Kymlicka suggests that this “ultimate value” is equality. Having a standard enables rationality because it enables competing theories to show “that one of the theories does a better job living up to the standard that they all recognize”. The measure for whether an argument weighs as much as it claims is how well (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Bibliography: A chronological bibliography of works on John Rawls' theory of justice.Robert K. Fullinwider - 1977 - Political Theory 5 (4):561-570.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • A Chronological Bibliography of Works On John Rawls' Theory of Justice.Robert K. Fullinwider - 1977 - Political Theory 5 (4):561-570.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Humanist Principles Underlying Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (2):149-174.
    This discussion reviews the thinking of some prominent philosophers of argument to extract principles common to their thinking. It shows that a growing concern with dialogical pragmatics is better appreciated as a part of applied ethics than of applied epistemology. The discussion concludes by indicating a possible consequence for philosophy of argument and invites further discussion by asking whether argumentation philosophy has an implicit, underlying moral, or even political, posture.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • The missing link revisited: The role of teleology in representing legal argument. [REVIEW]T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2002 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (1-3):79-94.
    In this paper I recapitulate the ideas of Berman and Hafner (1993) regarding the role of teleology in legal argument. I show how these ideas can be used to address some issues arising from more recent work on legal argument, and how this relates to ideas associated with the New Rhetoric of Perelman. I illustrate the points with a discussion of the classic problem of which vehicles should be allowed in parks.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  • Some axioms underlying argumentation theory.George Boger - unknown
    This paper examines whether philosophers of argument, in spite of their disavowing ‘timeless principles’, nevertheless embrace a set of principles, or axioms, to underlie argumentation theory. First, it reviews the thinking of some prominent philosophers of argument; second, it extracts some principles common to their philosophies; and third, it draws out possible consequences for argumentation theory and asks whether such theory has an underlying political posture.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Eclipsing Justice—a Foundational Compromise within Philosophy of Argument.George Boger - unknown
    Infusing logic with new rhetoric, dialogical pragmatics, and emphasizing argument context revolutionized the practice of logic. Critiquing oppressive practices and promoting justice, argumentationists empower participants to mediate their own argumentative situations. Against relativism to rescue the normative utility of good argument, argumentationists invoke the universal audience. Still, context-concerns eclipse its independence or resurrect rationalist absolutism. This vacillation imposes an external mediation that subverts establishing theoretical ground for promoting an empowering culture of justice.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation