Switch to: References

Citations of:

Frege and Kant on a priori knowledge

Synthese 77 (3):285 - 319 (1988)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Conditio sine qua non? Zuordnung in the early epistemologies of Cassirer and Schlick.T. A. Ryckman - 1991 - Synthese 88 (1):57 - 95.
    In early major works, Cassirer and Schlick differently recast traditional doctrines of the concept and of the relation of concept to intuitive content along the lines of recent epistemological discussions within the exact sciences. In this, they attempted to refashion epistemology by incorporating as its basic principle the notion of functional coordination, the theoretical sciences' own methodological tool for dispensing with the imprecise and unreliable guide of intuitive evidence. Examining their respective reconstructions of the theory of knowledge provides an axis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  • How Are A Priori Truths Possible?1.Christopher Peacocke - 1993 - European Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):175-199.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  • Kant Versus Frege on Arithmetic.Nora Grigore - 2022 - Axiomathes 32 (2):263-281.
    Kant's claim that arithmetical truths are synthetic is famously contradicted by Frege, who considers them to be analytical. It may seem that this is a mere dispute about linguistic labels, since both Kant and Frege agree that arithmetical truths are a priori and informative, and, therefore, it is only a matter of how one chooses to call them. I argue that the choice between calling arithmetic “synthetic” or “analytic” has a deeper significance. I claim that the dispute is not a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Subjective Justification.Graciela De Pierris - 1989 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):363-382.
    I wish to discuss in this paper some of the problems involved in determining whether subjects on particular occasions are justified in coming to believe a proposition. I will argue that in attributing actual justification to a particular subject–subjective justification–we have to take into account factual-psychological questions and that these are the source of fundamental difficulties. These factual-psychological questions concern the beliefs someone uses in the process of acquiring another belief and the actual connections she makes among her beliefs.But why (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation