Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Visual memory for agents and their actions.Justin N. Wood - 2008 - Cognition 108 (2):522-532.
  • A function for sensory storage: perception of rapid change.J. T. Lindsay Wilson - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):42-43.
  • Connectionist learning and the challenge of real environments.Mark Weaver & Stephen Kaplan - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):510-511.
  • Quantal basis of iconic dispersion.Gerald S. Wasserman - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):40-42.
  • The sequential pickup of spatial information needs visual memory.A. Vassilev & A. Penchev - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):40-40.
  • Connectionist models learn what?Timothy van Gelder - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):509-510.
  • Don't exterminate perceptual fruit flies!William R. Uttal - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):39-40.
  • Advances in neural network theory.Gérard Toulouse - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):509-509.
  • Connectionist models: Too little too soon?William Timberlake - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):508-509.
  • Why we need iconic memory.George Sperling - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):37-39.
  • Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
    People often fail to detect large changes to scenes, provided that the changes occur during a visual disruption. This phenomenon, known as ''change blindness,'' occurs both in the laboratory and in real-world situations in which changes occur unexpectedly. The pervasiveness of the inability to detect changes is consistent with the theoretical notion that we internally represent relatively little information from our visual world from one glance at a scene to the next. However, evidence for change blindness does not necessarily imply (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  • There is more to learning then meeth the eye.Noel E. Sharkey - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):506-507.
  • Icons, visual buffers, and eye movements.Keith Rayner - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):36-37.
  • The analysis of the learning needs to be deeper.John E. Rager - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):505-506.
  • Realistic neural nets need to learn iconic representations.W. A. Phillips, P. J. B. Hancock & L. S. Smith - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):505-505.
  • Change perception needs sensory storage.W. A. Phillips - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):35-36.
  • Learning from learned networks.M. Pavel - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):503-504.
  • The rise and fall of the sensory register.Ulric Neisser - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):35-35.
  • Keeping representations at bay.Stanley Munsat - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):502-503.
  • Visual persistence: Just a flash in the scan?Glenn E. Meyer - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):33-34.
  • On the nature of brief visual storage: There never was an icon.D. J. K. Mewhort & B. E. Butler - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):31-33.
  • Icons and iconoclasts.Dominic W. Massaro - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):31-31.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Toward a unification of conditioning and cognition in animal learning.William S. Maki - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):501-502.
  • The implications of occlusion for perceiving persistence.William M. Mace & Michael T. Turvey - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):29-31.
  • The icon as visual phenomenon and theoretical construct.Gerald M. Long - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):28-29.
  • Icons no, iconic memory yes.Vincent Di Lollo - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):19-20.
  • The continuing persistence of the icon.Geoffrey R. Loftus - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):28-28.
  • On learnability, empirical foundations, and naturalness.W. J. M. Levelt - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):501-501.
  • Approaches to learning and representation.Pat Langley - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):500-501.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • What can psychologists learn from hidden-unit nets?K. Lamberts & G. D'Ydewalle - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):499-500.
  • How connectionist models learn: The course of learning in connectionist networks.John K. Kruschke - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):498-499.
  • The icon is dead: Long live the icon.Roberta L. Klatzky - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):27-28.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Textons, rapid focal attention shifts, and iconic memory.Bela Julesz - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):25-27.
  • A non-empiricist perspective on learning in layered networks.Michael I. Jordan - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):497-498.
  • Reports of the icon's impending demise are premature.John Jonides - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):24-25.
  • Optic flow, icons, and memory.Gunnar Johansson - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):23-24.
  • Distinguishing supraspan from subspan iconic storage.Dennis H. Holding - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):22-23.
  • But what is the substance of connectionist representation?James Hendler - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):496-497.
  • The dependence of perception on persisting images and “icons”.G. Hauske, W. Wolf & H. Deubel - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):21-22.
  • What connectionist models learn: Learning and representation in connectionist networks.Stephen José Hanson & David J. Burr - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):471-489.
    Connectionist models provide a promising alternative to the traditional computational approach that has for several decades dominated cognitive science and artificial intelligence, although the nature of connectionist models and their relation to symbol processing remains controversial. Connectionist models can be characterized by three general computational features: distinct layers of interconnected units, recursive rules for updating the strengths of the connections during learning, and “simple” homogeneous computing elements. Using just these three features one can construct surprisingly elegant and powerful models of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   62 citations  
  • Learning and representation: Tensions at the interface.Steven José Hanson - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):511-518.
  • The icon is finally dead.Ralph Norman Haber - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):43-54.
  • The impending demise of the icon: A critique of the concept of iconic storage in visual information processing.Ralph Norman Haber - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):1-11.
  • Expose hidden assumptions in network theory.Karl Haberlandt - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):495-496.
  • Understanding recovery from object substitution masking.Stephanie C. Goodhew, Paul E. Dux, Ottmar V. Lipp & Troy A. W. Visser - 2012 - Cognition 122 (3):405-415.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Iconoclasm avoided: What the single neuron tells the psychologist about the icon.Michael E. Goldberg - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):20-21.
  • Are connectionist models just statistical pattern classifiers?Richard M. Golden - 1990 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (3):494-495.
  • Apparent motion and the icon.Ronald A. Finke - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):20-20.
  • Icons: To see or not to see.Stanley Coren - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (1):18-19.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation