- Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.details
|
|
Deliberative Rhetoric: Arguing about Doing.Christian Kock (ed.) - 2017 - Windsor: University of Windsor.details
|
|
The Value of Topoi.J. P. Zompetti - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (1):15-28.details
|
|
Argument by Multimodal Metaphor as Strategic Maneuvering in TV Commercials: A Case Study.Chuanrui Zhang & Cihua Xu - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):501-517.details
|
|
What Does an Argument Culture Look Like?David Zarefsky - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (3):296-308.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering in Political Argumentation.David Zarefsky - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):317-330.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering through Persuasive Definitions: Implications for Dialectic and Rhetoric. [REVIEW]David Zarefsky - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):399-416.details
|
|
The argumentative litotes in The Analects.Ying Yuan - 2017 - Argument and Computation 8 (3):253-266.details
|
|
Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering.Tangming Yuan & Tim Kelly - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):89-109.details
|
|
Perelman’s Audience Revisted: Towards the Construction of a New Type of Audience. [REVIEW]Galia Yanoshevsky - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):409-419.details
|
|
A functional perspective on argumentation schemes.Adam Wyner - 2016 - Argument and Computation 7 (2-3):113-133.details
|
|
Confrontational Maneuvering by Dissociation in Spokespersons’ Argumentative Replies at the Press Conferences of China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Peng Wu - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (1):1-22.details
|
|
Encroachments on State Sovereignty: The Argumentation Strategies of the George W. Bush Administration. [REVIEW]Carol K. Winkler - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):473-488.details
|
|
Reasoning, robots, and navigation: Dual roles for deductive and abductive reasoning.Janet Wiles - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):92-92.details
|
|
The Sunk Costs Fallacy or Argument from Waste.Douglas Walton - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):473-503.details
|
|
Reasoning from Classifications and Definitions.Douglas Walton & Fabrizio Macagno - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):81-107.details
|
|
On a razor's edge: evaluating arguments from expert opinion.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):139-159.details
|
|
Deceptive Arguments Containing Persuasive Language and Persuasive Definitions.Douglas Walton - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (2):159-186.details
|
|
Computational Dialectic and Rhetorical Invention.Douglas Walton - 2011 - AI and Society 26 (1):2011.details
|
|
Baseballs and arguments from fairness.Douglas Walton - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 22 (4):423-449.details
|
|
Argumentation Schemes and Enthymemes.D. Walton & C. A. Reed - 2005 - Synthese 145 (3):339-370.details
|
|
What’s So Funny About Arguing with God? A Case for Playful Argumentation from Jewish Literature.Don Waisanen, Hershey H. Friedman & Linda Weiser Friedman - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (1):57-80.details
|
|
Analogy, Similarity, and the Periodic Table of Arguments.Jean H. M. Wagemans - 2018 - Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 55 (1):63-75.details
|
|
On the Argumentative Strength of Indirect Inferential Conditionals.Sara Verbrugge & Hans Smessaert - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (3):337-362.details
|
|
Dialectical argumentation with argumentation schemes: An approach to legal logic. [REVIEW]Bart Verheij - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):167-195.details
|
|
Strategic Maneuvering with Dissociation.M. A. van Rees - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):473-487.details
|
|
In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.details
|
|
Don’t say that!J. A. van Laar - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):495-510.details
|
|
David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij (eds): Arguing on the Toulmin Model. New Essays in Argument Analysis and Evaluation. [REVIEW]Lester C. van der Pluijm & Jacky C. Visser - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (4):527-539.details
|
|
Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):322-350.details
|
|
Argumentative Strategies and Stylistic Devices.Ton van Haaften - 2019 - Informal Logic 39 (4):301-328.details
|
|
Ordinary People can Reason: A Rhetorical Case for Including Vernacular Voices in Ethical Public Relations Practice.Calvin L. Troup - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):441-453.details
|
|
Truth, Trust, and Telepresence.Paula S. Tompkins - 2003 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 18 (3-4):194-212.details
|
|
The New Rhetoric’s Inheritance.Ruth Amossy - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (3):313-324.details
|
|
Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):447-466.details
|
|
The Thesis of the Effectiveness of Quasi-logical Arguments.Iva Svačinová - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (1):75-106.details
|
|
On the Puzzling Death of the Sanctity-of-Life Argument.Katharina Stevens - 2020 - Argumentation 34 (1):55-81.details
|
|
The Normative Relevance of Cases.Marta Spranzi - 2012 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21 (4):481-492.details
|
|
Rhetorics of Health Citizenship: Exploring Vernacular Critiques of Government’s Role in Supporting Healthy Living.Philippa Spoel, Roma Harris & Flis Henwood - 2014 - Journal of Medical Humanities 35 (2):131-147.details
|
|
Negotiating Public and Professional Interests: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Debate Concerning the Regulation of Midwifery in Ontario, Canada. [REVIEW]Philippa Spoel & Susan James - 2006 - Journal of Medical Humanities 27 (3):167-186.details
|
|
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.details
|
|
De Gustibus Disputandum: The Aesthetics and Ethics of Taste in the Rhetorical Genre of the Restaurant Review.Lawrence Souder & Edward Bottone - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (6):895-907.details
|
|
Use and Misuse of Language in Judicial Decision-Making: Russian Experience. [REVIEW]Anita Soboleva - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):673-692.details
|
|
Judges as Readers, Authors and Dialecticians: Legal Interpretation in the ECtHR Cases on Mental Disability.Anita Soboleva - 2016 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 29 (3):557-575.details
|
|
Arguments and cases: An inevitable intertwining. [REVIEW]David B. Skalak & Edwina L. Rissland - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):3-44.details
|
|
A stitchwork quilt: Or how I learned to stop worrying and love cognitive relativism.Stuart Silvers - 1992 - Philosophical Psychology 5 (4):391 – 410.details
|
|
The New Rhetoric’s Concept of Universal Audience, Misconceived.J. E. Sigler - 2015 - Argumentation 29 (3):325-349.details
|
|
Power on the margins: A new place for intellectuals to be. [REVIEW]John Shotter - 1995 - Argumentation 9 (1):95-113.details
|
|
Second thoughts on the critiques of big rhetoric.Edward Schiappa - 2001 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 34 (3):260-274.details
|
|