Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Alexandre Koyré im “Mekka der Mathematik”.Paola Zambelli - 1999 - NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin 7 (1):208-230.
    In 1909 A. Koyré (1892–1964) came to Göttingen as an exile and there became a student of Edmund Husserl and other philosophers (A. Reinach, M. Scheler): already before leaving his country Russia Koyré read Husserl'sLogical Investigations, a text which interested greatly Russian philosophers and was translated into Russian in the same year. As many other contemporary philosophers, in Göttingen they were discussing on the fundaments of mathematic, Cantor's set theory and Russell's antinomies. On this problems Koyré wrote a long paper (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Law and Morality: A Critical Relation.Luc J. Wintgens - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (2):177-201.
    .The article deals with the difference between some forms of legal positivism. It is argued that, even in continental legal systems which are typically “rule bound,” there is some space left for principles in the legal system. The author tries to explain how this space can be filled and what methods should be used by a judge to do so.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
    		•
  • Chaïm Perelman: Justice, argumentation and ancient rhetoric. [REVIEW]Alonso Tordesillas - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (1):109-124.
    Theoretical interest in Perelman's thought is linked, for the main part, to the place he accords to the notion of argumentation, defined in his work in reference to the Greek philosophy, as represented by Plato and Aristotle, in contrast to the assertions of the sophists and rhetors. He separates the notion of demonstration and that of argumentation and supports his position on an analysis of the debates which were common in the sophistic and rhetoric period.It is in different ways that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Legal logic? Or can we do without?Arend Soeteman - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):197-210.
    In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Pierre de La Ramée et le déclin de la rhétorique.C. Perelman - 1991 - Argumentation 5 (4):347-356.
    This article provides a basic general introduction to Ramus, and evaluates his role in the history of logic and rhetoric, especially with relation to the study of argumentation. The author agrees with Ong and other historians of logic that Ramus is not to be taken seriously as a logician, and that his undoubted importance in the history of ideas is to be found elsewhere.Ramus advocates a belief in nature, experience and reason, and rejects the reliance on the authority of ancient (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Introduction.Ana Laura Nettel & Georges Roque - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):1-17.
    Introduction Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-17 DOI 10.1007/s10503-011-9238-3 Authors Ana Laura Nettel, Law Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana—Azcapotzalco (UAM-A), Amsterdam 180-403 Colonia Hipódromo Condesa, 06100 Mexico, DF, Mexico Georges Roque, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), CRAL, EHESS/CNRS, 96 Bd. Raspail, 75006 Paris, France Journal Argumentation Online ISSN 1572-8374 Print ISSN 0920-427X.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The rationality of legal argumentation.Sol Azuelos-Atias - 2009 - Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2):383-401.
    According to Dascal, controversy is characterised by a special kind of rationality, one result thereof being the unique contribution of this kind of polemics to the growth of knowledge. This, in turn, implies that complete cooperation may be detrimental for the efficiency of communication. In this article I discuss the kind of rationality that characterises controversy in legal discourse, in order to provide additional support to Dascal’s thesis about the uniqueness of the rationality of this kind of polemic exchange. I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • What argumentation can do for philosophy in the 21st century.Henrique Jales Ribeiro - unknown
    The author holds that the old theory according to which philosophy is the matrix of argumentation studies must be entirely reviewed currently. He argues that argumentation theory, as an interdisciplinary domain, may start playing, in new terms, the role which ― in the Cartesian tree ― was that of philosophy as the trunk of the different branches of human knowledge, as long as a set of requirements, which he lists, were met.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations