Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Journalism ethics in multinational family: “When in the eu, should one do as the eu journalists do?”.Melita Poler Kovačič - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (2):141 – 157.
    This essay reviews a number of issues regarding self-regulation and professional ethics which journalists across Europe might face in the scaling down of national borders. The dilemma of whether a pan-European ideal standards code of ethics can help journalists when working across borders and encountering other traditions is explored by referring to Slovenia, one of the new European Union (EU) members. Presenting a critique of the traditional professionalization concept, cogent arguments are found for rejecting a universal code of ethics. By (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Journalism Ethics in Multinational Family: “When in the EU, Should One Do as the EU Journalists Do?”.Melita Poler Kovačič - 2008 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (2):141-157.
    This essay reviews a number of issues regarding self-regulation and professional ethics which journalists across Europe might face in the scaling down of national borders. The dilemma of whether a pan-European ideal standards code of ethics can help journalists when working across borders and encountering other traditions is explored by referring to Slovenia, one of the new European Union (EU) members. Presenting a critique of the traditional professionalization concept, cogent arguments are found for rejecting a universal code of ethics. By (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Speech, Harm, and the Duties of Digital Intermediaries: Conceptualizing Platform Ethics.Brett Gregory Johnson - 2017 - Journal of Media Ethics 32 (1):16-27.
    ABSTRACTThis article poses the following questions: Do digital intermediaries have a duty to prevent or ameliorate harm to victims of vile speech? Or do they have a duty to ensure that as much speech as possible gets published on their platforms? To dissect this dilemma, this article offers ethical rationales behind these competing goals. The rationale for promoting speech is founded on a concern for the facilitation of discourse democracy, while the rationale for preventing harm is based on a concern (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations