Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Constructing objects and transforming experimental systems.Juha Tuunainen - 2001 - Perspectives on Science 9 (1):78-105.
    : The main contribution of this paper for social studies of scientific practice is to use and further elaborate the concept of experimental system. It is expanded from mere epistemic concerns to also incorporate the built-in practicality and societal relevance of scientific research. For this, an analysis of object construction by a potato-biotechnology research group is presented. The group's object of activity is conceptualized as a dual one comprising both the epistemic and applied objectives. The application object points to the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • “A good collaboration is based on unique contributions from each side”: assessing the dynamics of collaboration in stem cell science.Michael Morrison - 2017 - Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13 (1):1-20.
    The rise of ‘big biology’ is bringing academic and industrial scientists together in large consortia to address translational challenges in the life sciences. In order to assess the impact of this change, this paper examines the existing norms and styles of collaboration in one high profile translational domain; stem cell research. Data is drawn from qualitative interviews with academic and industry scientists working in a large European stem cell research project. Respondents discussed what they perceived as the main benefits and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Between theory and craft: exploring the role of co-operation within scientific research labs.Bryn Lander - 2011 - Spontaneous Generations 5 (1):58-74.
    This article explores how researchers in a scientific research lab co-operate with each other and value these co-operations, using a case study of a life sciences lab as an illustrative example. It explores how researchers within the lab co-operate in three main ways: through their ideas, methods and resources. A core contention of this article is that the values researchers attach to these different ways of co-operating can be assessed on two dimensions: goals and ways of understanding. The goals dimension (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark