Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. See What We Want to See? The Effects of Managerial Experience on Corporate Green Investments.Birte Schaltenbrand, Kai Foerstl, Arash Azadegan & Kevin Lindeman - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 150 (4):1129-1150.
    How impartial are managerial decisions? This question is particularly concerning when it comes to making green investment decisions in the face of stakeholder pressures. When managers respond to stakeholder pressures, their personal cognition, judgment, and past experiences play a role in determining their responses. The salience of particular stakeholder claims may be determined by deeply rooted individual preferences. This research investigates how a manager’s past experiences can influence green investments. Data are gathered from 247 managers about their past experience and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • CSR Structures: Evidence, Drivers, and Firm Value Implications.Kais Bouslah, Abdelmajid Hmaittane, Lawrence Kryzanowski & Bouchra M’Zali - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 185 (1):115-145.
    This paper investigates the corporate social responsibility (CSR) structures of U.S. listed firms. We find evidence of a general tendency towards CSR specialization with almost three-quarters (73.91%) of these firms focusing on a single CSR dimension. The degree of specialization varies across industries and the single CSR dimension focused on also varies for industries with similar degrees of specialization. We find that firms with higher exposures to CSR concerns, international activities, larger size, and higher financial slack tend to diversify across (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ideology and the Balanced Scorecard: An Empirical Exploration of the Tension Between Shareholder Value Maximization and Corporate Social Responsibility.Regina F. Bento, Lasse Mertins & Lourdes F. White - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 142 (4):769-789.
    In a society where the ideology of shareholder value maximization prevails, how do evaluators make appraisal and bonus decisions when corporate social responsibility measures and financial measures in the balanced scorecard point in different directions? To explore this question, we conducted two studies to develop and test a conceptual framework. Participants were asked to evaluate the performance of two managers, using a case we wrote about a commercial bank. We found that evaluators are more willing to drop CSR performance measures (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations