Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Three Pillars of Functional Autonomy of Hackers.Johan Söderberg & Maxigas - 2021 - NanoEthics 15 (1):43-56.
    We propose a conceptual framework for analysing the relationship between social emancipation and alternative technology development. Key is the “functional autonomy” of the collective of users and developers of the technology vis-a-vis state and capital. We draw on previous empirical work about three hacker projects to substantiate the claim that the functional autonomy of hackers rests on three “pillars of autonomy”: technical skill, shared values, and collective memory. These three pillars sustain the autonomy of a community of hackers so that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Maker Cultures and the Prospects for Technological Action.Susana Nascimento & Alexandre Pólvora - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (3):927-946.
    Supported by easier and cheaper access to tools and expanding communities, maker cultures are pointing towards the ideas of everyone designing, creating, producing and distributing renewed, new and improved products, machines, things or artefacts. A careful analysis of the assumptions and challenges of maker cultures emphasizes the relevance of what may be called technological action, that is, active and critical interventions regarding the purposes and applications of technologies within ordinary lives, thus countering the deterministic trends of current directions of technology. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark