Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Can we learn from eugenics?D. Wikler - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):183-194.
    Eugenics casts a long shadow over contemporary genetics. Any measure, whether in clinical genetics or biotechnology, which is suspected of eugenic intent is likely to be opposed on that ground. Yet there is little consensus on what this word signifies, and often only a remote connection to the very complex set of social movements which took that name. After a brief historical summary of eugenics, this essay attempts to locate any wrongs inherent in eugenic doctrines. Four candidates are examined and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  • Darwinian Disease Archaeology: Genomic Variants and the Eugenic Debate.Dorothy Porter - 2012 - History of Science 50 (4):432-452.
  • Remembering Richard Lewontin.Stuart A. Newman, Peter Godfrey-Smith, Daniel L. Hartl, Philip Kitcher, Diane B. Paul, John Beatty, Sahotra Sarkar, Elliott Sober & William C. Wimsatt - 2021 - Biological Theory 16 (4):257-267.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Biology of Stupidity: Genetics, Eugenics and Mental Deficiency in the Inter-War Years.David Barker - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (3):347-375.
    It may be thought that the title of this paper betrays a regrettable lack of sensitivity and good taste; it is as well, therefore, to explain its origin. Lewis Dexter was, I think, the first sociologist to apply a deviance perspective to the high-grade mentally retarded. ‘On the Politics and Sociology of Stupidity in Our Society’ argues that our discriminatory attitudes to the retarded have deep ideological roots; our social institutions tend ‘automatically’ to penalize stupidity; and repugnance often characterizes our (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations