Switch to: References

Citations of:

Evald Ilyenkov's philosophy revisited

Helsinki: Aleksanteri-instituutti (2000)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. E.V. Ilyenkov and Creative Soviet Theory: An Introduction to 'Dialectics of the Ideal'.Alex Levant - 2012 - Historical Materialism 20 (2):125-148.
    This article aims to introduce E.V. Ilyenkov’s ‘Dialectics of the Ideal’, first published in unabridged form in 2009, to an English-speaking readership. It does this in three ways: First, it contextualises his intervention in the history of Soviet and post-Soviet philosophy, offering a window into the subterranean tradition of creative theory that existed on the margins and in opposition to official Diamat. It explains what distinguishes Ilyenkov’s philosophy from the crude materialism of Diamat, and examines his relationship to four central (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Ilyenkov and language.Igor Hanzel - 2018 - Studies in East European Thought 70 (1):1-18.
    The article analyses the relation of E. V. Ilyenkov to the phenomenon of language. His approach, it is shown, had its roots in his explication of notion of ideal which led him to assign priority to work with respect to language at a general level as well as at the level ontogenesis of human infants. Two additional factors shaped his approach to the phenomenon of language. The first was his negative approach to disciplines investigating the structure of language: mathematical logic, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Spinoza, Marx, and Ilyenkov (who did not know Marx’s transcription of Spinoza).Bill Bowring - 2022 - Studies in East European Thought 74 (3):297-317.
    In this article I start with Marx's transcriptions of Spinoza, and the deep significance of what he transcribed, from the Theologico-Political Treatise and the Correspondence, and in what order. I contend that this demonstrates what was of particular interest and importance to him at that time. Second, I examine the presence, even if not explicit, of Spinoza in Marx's works, and turn to the question whether Marx was a Spinozist. I think he was. Third, I turn to Ilyenkov and his (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark