Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Clinical guidelines tensions ‐ a legal perspective. Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C.W.R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Brian Hurwitz Md Frcp Mrcgp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):301-304.
  • A false dichotomy. Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C. W. R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Jeremy M. Grimshaw Mbchb Phd Mrcgp, M. Stuart Watson Mbchb Msc Mrcgp & Martin Eccles Mbbs Md Frcp Frcgp Mfphm - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):295-298.
    SummaryThe dichotomy between ‘scientific’ and ‘practical’ approaches to guideline development is false and divisive. Instead we should concentrate on developing mechanisms to develop and implement valid guidelines to improve patient care. The development of valid guidelines requires considerable expertise and is time consuming and expensive. It is most efficiently done at a regional or national level. The implementation of valid guidelines requires local action including the identification and modification of valid guidelines and a coordinated evidence-based implementation strategy (Grimshaw & Eccles (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Clinical guidelines, EBM and health policy. Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C.W.R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]David J. Hunter Ma Phd Honmfphm - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):305-307.
  • The guidelines movement: tackling the wrong problem? Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C.W.R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Neil Mclntyre Bsc Md Frcp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):313-315.
  • Guidelines: time to spin some webs. Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C. W. R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Professor Deborah C. Saltman Mb Bs Fafphm - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):309-311.
  • Recent progress in health services research: on the need for evidence‐based debate.A. Miles MSc MPhil PhD, P. Bentley Phd Frcp Frcpath, A. Polychronis Mb Chb, J. Grey Phd Mrcp & N. Price Ba - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):257-265.
  • Treating individuals according to evidence: why do primary care practitioners do what they do?Nigel Oswald & Hilarie Bateman - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):139-148.
  • Principles to govern clinical governance.Carl W. R. Onion - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (4):405-412.
  • Clinical guidelines tensions: and now where? Commentary on 'Clinical guidelines: ways ahead' (C.W.R. Onion and T. Walley, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4, 287–293, this issue). [REVIEW]Gene Feder Bsc Mb Bs Md Frcgp - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):299-300.