Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Fans and Identity.Albert Piacente - 2018 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (1):92-105.
    This paper develops an understanding of the nature of sport fans that helps rebut the charge of nihilism leveled against identity anti-essentialism as represented in the work of Butler, Appiah, and...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Case for Inter-national Sport: A Reply to Gleaves and Llewellyn.Hywel Iorwerth & Alun Hardman - 2015 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 42 (3):425-441.
    In their recent contribution to JPS, Gleaves and Llewellyn argue on lusory and ethical grounds that elite sporting competition should cease to be predicated on competitions between nations. From a lusory perspective, they argue that inter-national sports’ limitation on who can compete undermines some of the central principles of elite sport, such as athletic supremacy and merit. From an ethical perspective, they argue that inter-national sport is categorically unethical because the national and cultural narratives that frame such contests are inherently (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Deeper Inside the Beautiful Game.Dennis Hemphill - 2005 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (1):105-115.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Brain-Injured Footballers, Voluntary Choice and Social Goods. A Reply to Corlett.Francisco Javier Lopez Frias & Michael John McNamee - 2019 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 14 (2):269-278.
    In this essay, we respond to Angelo Corlett’s criticism of our paper ‘Ethics, Brain Injuries, and Sports: Prohibition, Reform, and Prudence’. To do so, first, we revisit certain assumptions and arg...
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Football is football and is interesting, very interesting.Paul Davis - 2015 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 9 (2):140-152.
    There are robust consequences of the fact that football is football and not something else. The aesthetic personality of football does not submit to a template inappropriately borrowed from elsewhere. One consequence is that beauty should not be awarded privileged status. Any just aesthetics of the game must be properly hospitable to the game’s less hygienic and agonistic features, such as stolid defence, scuffling and scavenging, heroic goalkeeping, visible toil and strain, the intrinsic possibility of failure, the visibly strenuous working (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations